Lee Yen Yin

Lee Yen Yin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2022 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and negligence. Their track record shows a 80.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lee Yen Yin has demonstrated expertise across 29 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and commercial disputes.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	4 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Lee Yen Yin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Yen Yin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lee Yen Yin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Lee Yen Yin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Yen Yin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Yen Yin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Yen Yin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Premises Liability	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Yen Yin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Yen Yin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lee Yen Yin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Yen Yin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Transportation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Yen Yin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Yen Yin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Yen Yin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Yen Yin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Yen Yin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Yen Yin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lee Yen Yin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Yen Yin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Yen Yin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Yen Yin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Yen Yin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Dishonest assistance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lee Yen Yin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Accounting	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lee Yen Yin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Equitable Allowance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lee Yen Yin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Public Nuisance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lee Yen Yin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Yen Yin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Yen Yin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lee Yen Yin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lee Yen Yin has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Rajah & Cheah	4 cases	80% of cases	Zhejiang Crystal-Optech v Crystal-Moveon: Winding Up for Loss of Substratum & Failure to Commence Business(Mar 2024) Crystal-Moveon Technologies v Moveon Technologies: Stay of Proceedings Under Arbitration Act(Mar 2024) Moveon Technologies v Crystal-Moveon Technologies: Stay of Proceedings under Arbitration Act(Jan 2024)
ComLaw LLC	1 cases	20% of cases	Danny Raj v Ang Zhiqiang: Negligence and Public Nuisance Claim for Motorcycle Collision on SLE(Feb 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lee Yen Yin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.6
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	14.0 parties avg	4.0	20%
Won	42.3 parties avg	2.3	80%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2024	32.7 parties avg	2.7

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lee Yen Yin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(20%)	20%
Won	4(80%)	80%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	87,129,319.32	21,782,329.834 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2024	3 12	Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Zhejiang Crystal-Optech v Crystal-Moveon: Winding Up for Loss of Substratum & Failure to Commence Business 26 Mar 2024 Moveon Technologies Pte Ltd (Non-party)Neutral	26 Mar 2024	Moveon Technologies Pte Ltd (Non-party): Application dismissedMoveon Technologies Pte Ltd appeared as a non-party and opposed the Application. The application was ultimately granted.
2	Crystal-Moveon Technologies v Moveon Technologies: Stay of Proceedings Under Arbitration Act 13 Mar 2024 Moveon Technologies Pte Ltd (Respondent, Claimant)Won	13 Mar 2024	Moveon Technologies Pte Ltd (Respondent, Claimant): Decision UpheldThe decision to dismiss the stay application was upheld.
3	Moveon Technologies v Crystal-Moveon Technologies: Stay of Proceedings under Arbitration Act 15 Jan 2024 Moveon Technologies Pte Ltd (Claimant)Won	15 Jan 2024	Moveon Technologies Pte Ltd (Claimant): Application dismissed.Defendant's application to stay proceedings was dismissed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
4	Innovative Corp Pte Ltd v Ow Chun Ming: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Account of Profits for Eleven@Holland Project 22 Sep 2022 Innovative Corporation Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	22 Sep 2022	Innovative Corporation Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; the second defendant is to pay the plaintiff the sum of $84,548,250.96 and the first defendant is to pay the plaintiff the sum of $2,581,068.36 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Danny Raj v Ang Zhiqiang: Negligence and Public Nuisance Claim for Motorcycle Collision on SLE 13 Feb 2022 Ang Zhiqiang (Defendant)Won	13 Feb 2022	Ang Zhiqiang (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the defendant; the plaintiff's action was dismissed with costs to be paid by the plaintiff. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.