Leng Ting Kun

Leng Ting Kun is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in libel, slander and defamation and pleadings. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Leng Ting Kun has demonstrated expertise across 34 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Leng Ting Kun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Leng Ting Kun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Leng Ting Kun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Leng Ting Kun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Leng Ting Kun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Real Estate	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Leng Ting Kun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Libel, Slander and Defamation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Leng Ting Kun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Leng Ting Kun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Leng Ting Kun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Leng Ting Kun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Leng Ting Kun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Leng Ting Kun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Leng Ting Kun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Leng Ting Kun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Revision of Proceedings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Leng Ting Kun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Leng Ting Kun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Leng Ting Kun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Leng Ting Kun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Leng Ting Kun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Leng Ting Kun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Leng Ting Kun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Leng Ting Kun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Leng Ting Kun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Rules of Court 2021	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Leng Ting Kun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Leng Ting Kun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Assignment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Leng Ting Kun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Leng Ting Kun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Leng Ting Kun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction of Arbitral tribunal	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Leng Ting Kun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Leng Ting Kun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Ship Leasing	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Leng Ting Kun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Leng Ting Kun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Leng Ting Kun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Leng Ting Kun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Leng Ting Kun has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Foxwood LLC	3 cases	75% of cases	CBS v CBP: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice(Jan 2021) Soh Rui Yong v Singapore Athletic Association: Striking Out Plea of Malice in Defamation Suit(Oct 2020) Hai Jiao v Yaw Chee Siew: Contractual Obligations and Best Endeavours in Ship Leasing(Jul 2020)
Fervent Chambers LLC	1 cases	25% of cases	Low Eng Chai v Ishak bin Mohamed Basheere: Misrepresentation & Conspiracy in Sour Investments(Aug 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Leng Ting Kun's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.2
Complex Cases: 2 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.5 parties avg	3.5	75%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Leng Ting Kun's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(75%)	75%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1
USD	32,869,114.00	32,869,114.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Low Eng Chai v Ishak bin Mohamed Basheere: Misrepresentation & Conspiracy in Sour Investments 28 Aug 2022 Low Eng Chuan (Plaintiff)Lost	28 Aug 2022	Low Eng Chuan (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	CBS v CBP: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice 19 Jan 2021 CBP (Respondent)Won	19 Jan 2021	CBP (Respondent): Judgment in favor of RespondentThe court upheld the decision to set aside the arbitral award in favor of the appellant.
3	Soh Rui Yong v Singapore Athletic Association: Striking Out Plea of Malice in Defamation Suit 11 Oct 2020 Soh Rui Yong (Plaintiff, Respondent)Lost	11 Oct 2020	Soh Rui Yong (Plaintiff, Respondent): Plea of malice struck outParagraph 25 of the Amended Reply and its accompanying particulars struck out under Order 18 rr 19(1)(b) and 19(1)(c) of the Rules of Court.
4	Hai Jiao v Yaw Chee Siew: Contractual Obligations and Best Endeavours in Ship Leasing 12 Jul 2020 Yaw Chee Siew (Defendant)Lost	12 Jul 2020	Yaw Chee Siew (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the defendant in the amount of $32,869,114 (assumed USD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).