Leong Kai Yuan

Leong Kai Yuan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2012. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in admiralty and maritime law and arbitration. Their track record shows a 38.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 13% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Leong Kai Yuan has demonstrated expertise across 29 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Leong Kai Yuan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	5 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Leong Kai Yuan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized91% relevance score	Leong Kai Yuan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Leong Kai Yuan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Slot Charterparty	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Leong Kai Yuan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Leong Kai Yuan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Societies Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Leong Kai Yuan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Leong Kai Yuan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Leong Kai Yuan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Leong Kai Yuan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Leong Kai Yuan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Leong Kai Yuan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Leong Kai Yuan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Leong Kai Yuan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Leong Kai Yuan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Leong Kai Yuan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Leong Kai Yuan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Leong Kai Yuan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Leong Kai Yuan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Beneficial Ownership	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Leong Kai Yuan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Leong Kai Yuan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Management Committee	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Leong Kai Yuan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rules of Association	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Leong Kai Yuan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Price Reduction Services	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Leong Kai Yuan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Leong Kai Yuan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Leong Kai Yuan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Leong Kai Yuan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Leong Kai Yuan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Leong Kai Yuan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Leong Kai Yuan has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ang & Partners	4 cases	50% of cases	ANL Singapore Ltd v The “Pontianak Caraka Jaya Niaga III-34”: Stay of Proceedings for Foreign Arbitration(Oct 2010) ANL Singapore Ltd v The “Makassar Caraka Jaya Niaga III-39”: Dispute over Slot Charterparty Agreement and Foreign Arbitration(Oct 2010) ANL Singapore Ltd v The "Pontianak Caraka Jaya Niaga III-34": Arrest of Vessel & Stay of Proceedings in Favor of Arbitration(Oct 2010)
RHT Law LLP	3 cases	38% of cases	Phua Kiah Mai v Foo Jong Peng: Challenge to Removal of Association Leaders(Jan 2012) Chai Cher Watt v SDL Technologies: Breach of Contract, Sale of Goods Act(Oct 2011) Foo Song Mee v Ho Kiau Seng: Commission Dispute Over Property Purchase Discount(Sep 2011)
RHTLaw Taylor Wessing LLP	1 cases	13% of cases	Foo Jong Peng v Phua Kiah Mai: Power to Remove Office Bearers in Singapore Hainan Hwee Kuan Management Committee(Oct 2012)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Leong Kai Yuan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.2
Complex Cases: 1 (13%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	13%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Stayed	22.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	34.8 parties avg	4.8	38%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	42.3 parties avg	2.3
2011	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	25.3 parties avg	5.3

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Leong Kai Yuan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(13%)	13%
Partial	2(25%)	25%
Stayed	2(25%)	25%
Won	3(38%)	38%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	215,956.70	107,978.352 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	4 121	Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Stayed: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2011	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2012	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Foo Jong Peng v Phua Kiah Mai: Power to Remove Office Bearers in Singapore Hainan Hwee Kuan Management Committee 07 Oct 2012 Hun Chin Guan (Respondent)Won	07 Oct 2012	Hun Chin Guan (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of $25,000 fixed in favor of the Respondents (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Phua Kiah Mai v Foo Jong Peng: Challenge to Removal of Association Leaders 18 Jan 2012 Phua Kiah Mai (Plaintiff)Won	18 Jan 2012	Phua Kiah Mai (Plaintiff): Applications allowedThe plaintiffs' applications in this Originating Summons are allowed.
3	Chai Cher Watt v SDL Technologies: Breach of Contract, Sale of Goods Act 16 Oct 2011 Chai Cher Watt (trading as Chuang Aik Engineering Works) (Appellant)Partial	16 Oct 2011	Chai Cher Watt (trading as Chuang Aik Engineering Works) (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part inasmuch as it relates to the Respondent’s breach of the Drill Contract. The Appellant is thus entitled to refunds of the sums paid in respect of the Drilling Machine and damages for their losses suffered due to the breach. The matter is remitted to the Judge to determine the precise sums to be awarded. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Foo Song Mee v Ho Kiau Seng: Commission Dispute Over Property Purchase Discount 05 Sep 2011 Ho Kiau Seng (Respondent)Lost	05 Sep 2011	Ho Kiau Seng (Respondent): Counterclaim AllowedJudgment was given to the Respondent for his counterclaim of $165,956.70 in the High Court. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	ANL Singapore Ltd v The “Pontianak Caraka Jaya Niaga III-34”: Stay of Proceedings for Foreign Arbitration 24 Oct 2010 PT Djakarta Lloyd (Persero) (Respondent, Intervener)Partial	24 Oct 2010	PT Djakarta Lloyd (Persero) (Respondent, Intervener): Successful in partThe respondent successfully argued for a stay of proceedings in favor of foreign arbitration, but lost the appeal against setting aside the service of the Writ of Summons.
6	ANL Singapore Ltd v The “Makassar Caraka Jaya Niaga III-39”: Dispute over Slot Charterparty Agreement and Foreign Arbitration 24 Oct 2010 PT Djakarta Lloyd (Persero) (Respondent, Intervener)Won	24 Oct 2010	PT Djakarta Lloyd (Persero) (Respondent, Intervener): Stay of proceedings affirmedThe court affirmed the stay of proceedings in favor of foreign arbitration.
7	ANL Singapore Ltd v The "Pontianak Caraka Jaya Niaga III-34": Arrest of Vessel & Stay of Proceedings in Favor of Arbitration 18 Oct 2010 PT Djakarta Lloyd (Persero) (Respondent, Intervener)Stayed	18 Oct 2010	PT Djakarta Lloyd (Persero) (Respondent, Intervener): Proceedings stayedThe court affirmed the decision to stay the proceedings in favour of foreign arbitration.
8	ANL Singapore Ltd v The "Makassar Caraka Jaya Niaga III-39": Admiralty Claim, Beneficial Ownership & Arbitration 18 Oct 2010 PT Djakarta Lloyd (Persero) (Respondent, Intervener)Stayed	18 Oct 2010	PT Djakarta Lloyd (Persero) (Respondent, Intervener): Proceedings stayed in favour of arbitrationThe appeal against the Assistant Registrar’s decision to stay the proceedings in favour of foreign arbitration was dismissed.