Leow Jiamin

Leow Jiamin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 13 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in patents and copyrights. Their track record shows a 38.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 11 complex cases, representing 85% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Leow Jiamin has demonstrated expertise across 61 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and patents.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Patents	6 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	5 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	4 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice24% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized91% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Nominee Director	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Disqualification	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Auditing Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Tiered Dispute Resolution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inventions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Patent Infringement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Validity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Groundless Threats	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Accountants Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Revocation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Case Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Leow Jiamin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Leow Jiamin has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	9 cases	69% of cases	I-Admin (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Hong Ying Ting: Copyright Infringement and Breach of Confidence Dispute(Apr 2020) Sun Electric v Sunseap: Security for Costs in Patent Infringement Suits(Jan 2020) Bijynath v Innovationz: Director Disqualification Relief Under Companies Act(Sep 2019)
WongPartnership LLP	4 cases	31% of cases	Cachet Multi Strategy Fund SPC v Feng Shi: Striking Out Claims & Abuse of Process(Oct 2023) Tritech v Duan Wei: Breach of Confidence, Misrepresentation, and Negligence Claims(Feb 2023) Sang Cheol Woo v Charles Choi Spackman: Enforcement of Foreign Judgments and Conspiracy Claims(Nov 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Leow Jiamin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.6
Complex Cases: 11 (85%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	35.2 parties avg	5.2	23%
Partial	54.9 parties avg	4.9	38%
Won	53.9 parties avg	3.9	38%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2018	112.0 parties avg	12.0
2019	43.9 parties avg	3.9
2020	24.3 parties avg	4.3
2022	26.0 parties avg	6.0
2023	24.8 parties avg	4.8

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Leow Jiamin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(23%)	23%
Partial	5(38%)	38%
Won	5(38%)	38%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	981,338.59	245,334.654 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	4 22	Partial: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2020	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 13 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Cachet Multi Strategy Fund SPC v Feng Shi: Striking Out Claims & Abuse of Process 12 Oct 2023 Cachet Multi Strategy Fund SPC on behalf of Cachet Special Opportunities SP (Claimant)Won	12 Oct 2023	Cachet Multi Strategy Fund SPC on behalf of Cachet Special Opportunities SP (Claimant): Application dismissedThe claimant won the application to strike out the claims. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Tritech v Duan Wei: Breach of Confidence, Misrepresentation, and Negligence Claims 21 Feb 2023 Tritech Engineering & Testing (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	21 Feb 2023	Tritech Engineering & Testing (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff in partJudgment for Plaintiff in part. Damages to be assessed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Sang Cheol Woo v Charles Choi Spackman: Enforcement of Foreign Judgments and Conspiracy Claims 29 Nov 2022 Sang Cheol Woo (Plaintiff)Partial	29 Nov 2022	Sang Cheol Woo (Plaintiff): Seoul High Court Judgment enforceableJudgment for Plaintiff; Seoul High Court Judgment enforceable against the first defendant, Charles Choi Spackman. Korean Supreme Court Judgment and New York Judgment not enforceable. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	CSY v CSZ: Stay of Court Proceedings & Court's Discretion Under Arbitration Act 18 May 2022 CSZ (Respondent)Lost	18 May 2022	CSZ (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the High Court's decision to stay part of HC/S 237/2021 in favour of a domestic arbitration was overturned.
5	I-Admin (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Hong Ying Ting: Copyright Infringement and Breach of Confidence Dispute 05 Apr 2020 I-Admin (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	05 Apr 2020	I-Admin (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in partThe appellant succeeded in its claims for breach of confidence and have its injury vindicated by a measure of equitable damages, to be assessed.
6	Sun Electric v Sunseap: Security for Costs in Patent Infringement Suits 21 Jan 2020 Sunseap Leasing Pte Ltd (Defendants, Applicants)Won	21 Jan 2020	Sunseap Leasing Pte Ltd (Defendants, Applicants): Security for costs grantedDefendants' application for security for costs granted; Plaintiff ordered to furnish security for costs totaling $315,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Bijynath v Innovationz: Director Disqualification Relief Under Companies Act 17 Sep 2019 Bijynath s/o Ram Nawal (Plaintiff)Won	17 Sep 2019	Bijynath s/o Ram Nawal (Plaintiff): Application GrantedPlaintiff relieved from disqualification under section 155A(1) of the Companies Act.
8	Sun Electric v Sunseap: Patent Infringement, Interrogatories, and Particulars 26 Aug 2019 Sunseap Leasing Pte Ltd (Defendants, Applicants)Partial	26 Aug 2019	Sunseap Leasing Pte Ltd (Defendants, Applicants): PartialThe Defendants' application for the withdrawal of the Interrogatories was declined, with amendments to some interrogatories.
9	Sun Electric v Sunseap: Pleadings, Particulars, & Patent Infringement 18 Feb 2019 Sunseap Leasing Pte Ltd (Defendants, Applicants)Partial	18 Feb 2019	Sunseap Leasing Pte Ltd (Defendants, Applicants): Application for further and better particulars granted in part and dismissed in partThe Defendants' application for further and better particulars was partially granted and partially dismissed.
10	Sunseap v Sun Electric: High Court's Jurisdiction in Patent Revocation Proceedings 09 Jan 2019 Sunseap Leasing Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant)Won	09 Jan 2019	Sunseap Leasing Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	PCCW Media v M1 Ltd: Copyright Infringement & Site Blocking under Section 193DDA of the Copyright Act 23 Apr 2018 PCCW Media Limited (Plaintiff)Lost	23 Apr 2018	PCCW Media Limited (Plaintiff): Application DismissedThe plaintiff's application for an order under s 193DDA of the Copyright Act was dismissed because it lacked the legal standing to bring the application.
12	Sun Electric Pte Ltd v Sunseap Group Pte Ltd: Patent Revocation & High Court Jurisdiction 27 Sep 2017 Sunseap Leasing Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	27 Sep 2017	Sunseap Leasing Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the High Court does not have original jurisdiction under the Patents Act to revoke a patent by way of a counterclaim in infringement proceedings. The court assumes the currency is SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	Sun Electric v Sunseap: Patent Validity, Groundless Threats, and Revocation 03 May 2017 Sunseap Leasing Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	03 May 2017	Sunseap Leasing Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Successful DefenceThe Defendants successfully resisted the Plaintiff's application to strike out parts of their Defence and Counterclaim and the Particulars of Objection.