Letchamanan Devadason

Letchamanan Devadason is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 17 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 7 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in sentencing and credit and security. Their track record shows a 28.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 29% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated expertise across 94 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and estoppel.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	14 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 14 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	6 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	6 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	5 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Non est factum	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice29% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Money and moneylenders	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Set-off	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Moneylenders Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offences Relating to Property	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Appeals	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Falsification of Documents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Crossclaims	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rules of construction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inter vivos gift	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cheating	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual Licence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Occupiers' Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Economic Duress	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Presumed Resulting Trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory illegality	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal loan	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mental incapacity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Violence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Harmonious relationship clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Indemnity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Directors' Liabilities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Land Titles	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance Broking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Financial Advisory Services	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Right of Way	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commission Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Easements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Partnership Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Gifts Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Knowing Receipt	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Contempt	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Letchamanan Devadason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Letchamanan Devadason has been affiliated with 7 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
LegalStandard LLP	6 cases	35% of cases	Yeo Kee Siah v Public Prosecutor: Cheating & Falsification of Documents in Parallel Car Import Financing(Mar 2024) Lim Choo Hin v Lim Sai Ing Peggy: Resulting Trusts & Inter Vivos Gift Dispute over HDB Flat(Dec 2021) Leck Kim Koon v Public Prosecutor: Cheating, Penal Code s 420, Sentencing Principles & Ill Health(Oct 2021)
Steven Lee, Dason & Khoo	3 cases	18% of cases	PP v Lim Teck Choon: Appeal Against Fine for Attempting to Bribe Police Officer under Prevention of Corruption Act(Jan 2009) CST Cleaning v National Parks Board: Indemnity Clause & Concurrent Negligence(Aug 2008) Donald McArthy Trading v Pankaj: Legality of L/C Facility Agreement under Moneylenders Act(Feb 2007)
Legal Standard LLP	3 cases	18% of cases	Ram Niranjan v Navin Jatia: Costs Allocation in Breach of Contract & Minority Oppression Suit(Jun 2019) Ram Niranjan v Navin Jatia: Minority Oppression, Contractual Disputes, and Property Rights(May 2019) Tahir v Tay Kar Oon: Contempt of Court for Breaching Examination of Judgment Debtor and Mareva Injunction Orders(Apr 2016)
Steven Lee, Dason & Partners	2 cases	12% of cases	Wong Leong Wei Edward v Acclaim Insurance: Commission Dispute & Mass Resignation(Dec 2010) Lian Kok Hong v Lee Choi Kheong: Easement Dispute over Right of Way on Belmont Road(Apr 2010)
Harpal Mahtani Partnership	1 cases	6% of cases	Pankaj v Donald McArthy: Illegal Moneylending & Letters of Credit Dispute(Jul 2006)
LegalStandard LLC	1 cases	6% of cases	Navin Jatia v Ram Niranjan: Validity of August 2015 Deed & Family Arrangements(Apr 2020)
P Tan & Company	1 cases	6% of cases	Asia Polyurethane v Tandjung Marketing: Breach of Contract & Fiduciary Duty Dispute(Feb 2007)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Letchamanan Devadason's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 5 (29%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	24.3 parties avg	4.3	12%
Lost	73.0 parties avg	3.0	41%
Neutral	15.0 parties avg	5.0	6%
Partial	34.0 parties avg	4.0	18%
Won	52.8 parties avg	2.8	29%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2007	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2020	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2021	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Letchamanan Devadason's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	2(11%)	11%
Lost	7(39%)	39%
Neutral	1(6%)	6%
Partial	3(17%)	17%
Won	5(28%)	28%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	535,317.28	48,665.2111 cases	11
USD	7,579,960.00	7,579,960.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2008	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	3 111	Dismissed: 1 cases (33.3%) Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%)
2020	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 17 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Yeo Kee Siah v Public Prosecutor: Cheating & Falsification of Documents in Parallel Car Import Financing 18 Mar 2024 Yeo Kee Siah (Appellant)Lost	18 Mar 2024	Yeo Kee Siah (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
2	Lim Choo Hin v Lim Sai Ing Peggy: Resulting Trusts & Inter Vivos Gift Dispute over HDB Flat 14 Dec 2021 Lim Choo Hin (as the sole executrix of the estate of Lim Guan Heong, deceased) (Appellant, Applicant)Won	14 Dec 2021	Lim Choo Hin (as the sole executrix of the estate of Lim Guan Heong, deceased) (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; LCH granted the declaration of trust sought in OS 168 and costs fixed at $40,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Leck Kim Koon v Public Prosecutor: Cheating, Penal Code s 420, Sentencing Principles & Ill Health 19 Oct 2021 Leck Kim Koon (Appellant)Lost	19 Oct 2021	Leck Kim Koon (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
4	North Star (S) Capital Pte Ltd v Megatrucare Pte Ltd: Illegality of Loan Guarantee & Mental Capacity 05 May 2021 North Star (S) Capital Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim)Lost	05 May 2021	North Star (S) Capital Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim was dismissed on the ground that the Guarantee was given in relation to an illegal personal loan. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Navin Jatia v Ram Niranjan: Validity of August 2015 Deed & Family Arrangements 05 Apr 2020 Evergreen Global Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant, Respondent)Partial	05 Apr 2020	Evergreen Global Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partCA 202/2018 is allowed in part to the extent stated in the judgment.
6	Ram Niranjan v Navin Jatia: Costs Allocation in Breach of Contract & Minority Oppression Suit 06 Jun 2019 Evergreen Global Pte Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	06 Jun 2019	Evergreen Global Pte Ltd (Defendant): Neutral
7	Ram Niranjan v Navin Jatia: Minority Oppression, Contractual Disputes, and Property Rights 28 May 2019 Evergreen Global Pte Ltd (Defendant)Dismissed	28 May 2019	Evergreen Global Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaims against Evergreen Global Pte Ltd were dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Traxiar Drilling Partners II Pte Ltd v Dvergsten: Breach of Directors' Duties & Fraudulent Trading 22 Jan 2018 Traxiar Drilling Partners II Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff)Won	22 Jan 2018	Traxiar Drilling Partners II Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff in the amount of US$7,579,960, reflecting the loss caused by the Defendant’s breach of his duties owed as director.
9	Tahir v Tay Kar Oon: Contempt of Court for Breaching Examination of Judgment Debtor and Mareva Injunction Orders 11 Apr 2016 Tay Kar Oon (Defendant)Lost	11 Apr 2016	Tay Kar Oon (Defendant): ImprisonmentDefendant sentenced to eight weeks’ imprisonment for contempt of court.
10	Wong Wai Yin v Victoria Publications: Recovery of Salary and Director's Fees Dispute 14 Jul 2015 Victoria Publications Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	14 Jul 2015	Victoria Publications Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the Defendant; Plaintiff's claim dismissed.
11	Wong Leong Wei Edward v Acclaim Insurance: Commission Dispute & Mass Resignation 02 Dec 2010 Acclaim Insurance Brokers Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	02 Dec 2010	Acclaim Insurance Brokers Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim Partially SucceedsThe defendant’s counterclaim in Suit 781 succeeds only to the extent of $23,182.02 which is to be set-off against the judgment sum due to the second plaintiff. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	Lian Kok Hong v Lee Choi Kheong: Easement Dispute over Right of Way on Belmont Road 27 Apr 2010 Lee Choi Kheong and others (Respondent)Lost	27 Apr 2010	Lee Choi Kheong and others (Respondent): Counterclaim DismissedCounterclaim dismissed; each party to bear his/their own costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	PP v Lim Teck Choon: Appeal Against Fine for Attempting to Bribe Police Officer under Prevention of Corruption Act 05 Jan 2009 Lim Teck Choon (Respondent)Lost	05 Jan 2009	Lim Teck Choon (Respondent): Fine Replaced with ImprisonmentThe initial fine of $15,000 was set aside and replaced with a six-week imprisonment term. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
14	CST Cleaning v National Parks Board: Indemnity Clause & Concurrent Negligence 21 Aug 2008 CST Cleaning & Trading Pte Ltd (Appellant)Partial	21 Aug 2008	CST Cleaning & Trading Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partThe Board is entitled to judgment against the Contractor for 50% of the total amount of $114,270.52 with interest thereon calculated from the date of payment to Liew up to the date of payment of this judgment. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	Donald McArthy Trading v Pankaj: Legality of L/C Facility Agreement under Moneylenders Act 13 Feb 2007 Pankaj s/o Dhirajlal (trading as TopBottom Impex) (Respondent)Won	13 Feb 2007	Pankaj s/o Dhirajlal (trading as TopBottom Impex) (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The court found that the agreement was not a moneylending arrangement. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
16	Asia Polyurethane v Tandjung Marketing: Breach of Contract & Fiduciary Duty Dispute 01 Feb 2007 Tandjung Marketing International Pte Ltd (Defendant)Dismissed	01 Feb 2007	Tandjung Marketing International Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedThe defendant's counterclaim was dismissed due to deficiencies in pleading and evidence.
17	Pankaj v Donald McArthy: Illegal Moneylending & Letters of Credit Dispute 25 Jul 2006 Pankaj s/o Dhirajlal (Plaintiff)Won	25 Jul 2006	Pankaj s/o Dhirajlal (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffThe court found that the arrangement did not constitute moneylending, and therefore ruled in favor of the plaintiff. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.