Li Jiaxin

Li Jiaxin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and lump sum contract. Their track record shows a 80.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Li Jiaxin has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in construction law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Construction Law	4 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Li Jiaxin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Li Jiaxin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Li Jiaxin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Li Jiaxin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Li Jiaxin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Li Jiaxin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Li Jiaxin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Li Jiaxin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Li Jiaxin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Lump sum contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Li Jiaxin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Adjudication	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Li Jiaxin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Design and build contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Li Jiaxin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Li Jiaxin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Li Jiaxin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Dispute Resolution	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Li Jiaxin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Li Jiaxin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Li Jiaxin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of natural justice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Li Jiaxin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Li Jiaxin has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Michael Por Law Corporation	5 cases	100% of cases	Ng Tze Chew Diana v Aikco Construction: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice(Nov 2019) Ng Tze Chew Diana v Aikco Construction: Appeal Out of Time & Extension of Time for Arbitration Award(Nov 2019) JFC Builders v Permasteelisa: Security of Payment Act Dispute over Built-in Fitment Installation(Nov 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Li Jiaxin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Won	42.0 parties avg	2.0	80%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Li Jiaxin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20%)	20%
Won	4(80%)	80%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	692,132.53	230,710.843 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ng Tze Chew Diana v Aikco Construction: Appeal Out of Time & Extension of Time for Arbitration Award 04 Nov 2019 Aikco Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	04 Nov 2019	Aikco Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent): Application DismissedThe application for leave to appeal was dismissed, upholding the original arbitral award in favor of Aikco Construction Pte Ltd.
2	Ng Tze Chew Diana v Aikco Construction: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice 04 Nov 2019 Aikco Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	04 Nov 2019	Aikco Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff): Applications dismissedApplications to set aside the arbitral award and to set aside the order of court granting the respondent leave to enforce the award were dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	JFC Builders v Permasteelisa: Security of Payment Act Dispute over Built-in Fitment Installation 06 Nov 2016 JFC Builders Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	06 Nov 2016	JFC Builders Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application DismissedApplication to set aside the adjudication determination was dismissed with costs fixed at $8,000 (inclusive of disbursements). The court also ordered payment out to the defendant of the sum paid into court by the plaintiff. The court ordered the plaintiff to pay to the defendant the sum of $4,534.13 as the plaintiff’s share of the adjudication costs and interest at 5.33% of the adjudicated amount of $70,865.45 from 31 May 2016 to the date of full payment of the adjudicated amount. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Goh Eng Lee Andy v Yeo Jin Kow: Design and Build Contract Dispute 01 Jun 2016 Goh Eng Lee Andy (Plaintiff)Won	01 Jun 2016	Goh Eng Lee Andy (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $692,132.53 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Lioncity Construction v JFC Builders: Extension of Time for Appeal to High Court 11 Mar 2015 JFC Builders Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Won	11 Mar 2015	JFC Builders Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal UpheldThe appeal by Lioncity Construction Company Pte Ltd was dismissed.