Li Yihong

Li Yihong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 11 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal procedure and criminal law. Their track record shows a 45.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Li Yihong has demonstrated expertise across 38 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal procedure and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Procedure	10 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Li Yihong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	10 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Li Yihong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	10 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Li Yihong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	6 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice29% relevance score	Li Yihong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Li Yihong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Domestic Maid Abuse	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Li Yihong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice14% relevance score	Li Yihong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Li Yihong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appeal	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Li Yihong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice8% relevance score	Li Yihong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Li Yihong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Offences	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Li Yihong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Voluntarily Causing Hurt	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Li Yihong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Disclosure	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Li Yihong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Li Yihong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Principles	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Li Yihong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Newton hearings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Li Yihong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mentally disordered offenders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Li Yihong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Rage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Li Yihong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Adducing fresh evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Li Yihong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Prosecution failing to disclose material	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Li Yihong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Consequences of Prosecution’s non-disclosure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Li Yihong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Confiscation and forfeiture	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Li Yihong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Public Order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Li Yihong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assault	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Li Yihong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Li Yihong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Li Yihong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Collections	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice1% relevance score	Li Yihong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Li Yihong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice1% relevance score	Li Yihong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maid Abuse	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Li Yihong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Li Yihong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Li Yihong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Li Yihong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restitution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Li Yihong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Young Offenders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Li Yihong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice1% relevance score	Li Yihong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Li Yihong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Li Yihong has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 11 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	11 cases	100% of cases	Lim Hong Liang v Public Prosecutor: Prosecution's Disclosure Obligations & Retrial(May 2021) Moad Fadzir Bin Mustaffa v Public Prosecutor: Review of Drug Trafficking Conviction and Sentencing(Oct 2020) Public Prosecutor v Bong Sim Swan, Suzanna: Maid Abuse Sentencing and Psychological Harm(Sep 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Li Yihong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.2
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	9%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	9%
Partial	42.0 parties avg	2.0	36%
Won	52.4 parties avg	2.4	45%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	62.3 parties avg	2.3
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Li Yihong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(9%)	9%
Neutral	1(9%)	9%
Partial	4(36%)	36%
Won	5(45%)	45%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2020	6 1122	Lost: 1 cases (16.7%) Neutral: 1 cases (16.7%) Partial: 2 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (33.3%)
2021	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 11 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lim Hong Liang v Public Prosecutor: Prosecution's Disclosure Obligations & Retrial 03 May 2021 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	03 May 2021	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part; retrial ordered.
2	Moad Fadzir Bin Mustaffa v Public Prosecutor: Review of Drug Trafficking Conviction and Sentencing 11 Oct 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	11 Oct 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application dismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully opposed the application for leave to review the earlier decision.
3	Public Prosecutor v Bong Sim Swan, Suzanna: Maid Abuse Sentencing and Psychological Harm 22 Sep 2020 Public Prosecutor (Applicant)Partial	22 Sep 2020	Public Prosecutor (Applicant): Sentence of imprisonment enhancedSentence of imprisonment enhanced from eight months to 14 months.
4	Lim Hong Liang v Public Prosecutor: Disclosure of Evidence & Appeal Against Conviction 25 Aug 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	25 Aug 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Motion Partially LostMotion allowed, but no costs were ordered against the Prosecution. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	PP v Bong Sim Swan: Domestic Maid Abuse, Sentencing Framework, and Causal Link 20 Aug 2020 Public Prosecutor (Applicant)Neutral	20 Aug 2020	Public Prosecutor (Applicant): Questions answeredTwo questions answered in the affirmative, one question not answered.
6	Public Prosecutor v Raj Kumar: Trafficking Cannabis under Misuse of Drugs Act 14 Jun 2020 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	14 Jun 2020	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): ConvictionThe Prosecution successfully convicted both accused.
7	Bong Sim Swan Suzanna v Public Prosecutor: Maid Abuse & Relevance of Uncharged Offending Conduct in Sentencing 21 Jan 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	21 Jan 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal against sentence dismissedThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentence was dismissed.
8	Ng Soon Kim v Public Prosecutor: Voluntarily Causing Hurt by Fire & Sentencing Appeal 16 Oct 2019 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	16 Oct 2019	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal partially successfulThe appeal was partially successful in reducing the sentence and disqualification period.
9	Ho Mei Xia Hannah v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence for Offences Against Public Servants 09 Sep 2019 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	09 Sep 2019	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal UpheldThe Public Prosecutor's position was upheld as the appeal was dismissed.
10	PP v Holman Benjamin John: Voluntarily Causing Hurt at MRT Station 01 Nov 2018 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	01 Nov 2018	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal against sentence allowed; original sentence of four weeks' imprisonment substituted with two months' imprisonment (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	Janardana Jayasankarr v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence for Voluntarily Causing Hurt to Domestic Helper 03 Aug 2016 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	03 Aug 2016	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment UpheldThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the original sentence imposed by the District Judge.