Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth

Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in judgments and orders and misrepresentation. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 80% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has demonstrated expertise across 42 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	4 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice16% relevance score	Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice29% relevance score	Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Stay of Execution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bank Guarantee	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Escrow Account	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Quantification of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Assets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Share Purchase Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contractual Warranties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Tort of Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Pre-Effective Date Indemnity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commissions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	3 cases	60% of cases	Ivanishvili v Credit Suisse: Stay of Execution Pending Appeal in Trust Dispute(Nov 2023) Ivanishvili v Credit Suisse: Breach of Trust, Quantification of Losses & Costs(Sep 2023) Wong Kee Wah v Sng Boon Chye: Commission Dispute over ATO Programmes(Oct 2022)
WongPartnership LLP	2 cases	40% of cases	CFJ v CFL: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Oil & Gas Share Sale Dispute(Jan 2023) CNA v CNB: Striking Out Setting Aside Application for International Arbitral Award(Aug 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.3
Complex Cases: 4 (80%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	24.5 parties avg	4.5	40%
Partial	16.0 parties avg	6.0	20%
Won	25.3 parties avg	5.3	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	35.7 parties avg	5.7

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(40%)	40%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	2(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	289,170.10	289,170.101 cases	1
USD	3,713,650,000.00	3,713,650,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ivanishvili v Credit Suisse: Stay of Execution Pending Appeal in Trust Dispute 01 Nov 2023 Bera Ivanishvili (Plaintiff)Partial	01 Nov 2023	Bera Ivanishvili (Plaintiff): Stay of execution granted on conditionStay of execution granted on the condition that the defendant pays into Court the full amount of the judgment sums plus post-judgment interest.
2	Ivanishvili v Credit Suisse: Breach of Trust, Quantification of Losses & Costs 18 Sep 2023 Bera Ivanishvili (Plaintiff)Won	18 Sep 2023	Bera Ivanishvili (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffThe defendant shall pay to a Trust Fund, the trustee of such fund being identified by the plaintiffs to be the 2nd plaintiff, the sum of US$742.73m, being the plaintiffs’ losses calculated in accordance with Model 1B from 30 March 2008 to 26 May 2023 and taking into account the Settlement dated 1 December 2022.
3	CFJ v CFL: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Oil & Gas Share Sale Dispute 30 Jan 2023 CFK (Plaintiff)Lost	30 Jan 2023	CFK (Plaintiff): Applications dismissed in their entiretyApplications to set aside the Second and Third Partial Awards and to remove the Presiding Arbitrator were dismissed.
4	Wong Kee Wah v Sng Boon Chye: Commission Dispute over ATO Programmes 24 Oct 2022 Wong Kee Wah t/a The Education Future Hub (Appellant, Plaintiff)Won	24 Oct 2022	Wong Kee Wah t/a The Education Future Hub (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedD is to pay P $345,609.30. P is to pay D $42,864.00 and $13,575.20 in respect of TLI and BITC programmes respectively. Balance: $289,170.10 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	CNA v CNB: Striking Out Setting Aside Application for International Arbitral Award 12 Aug 2021 CNC (Defendant)Lost	12 Aug 2021	CNC (Defendant): Striking out application dismissedThe defendant's application to strike out the originating summons was dismissed.