Liao Ruiyi

Liao Ruiyi is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and costs. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Liao Ruiyi has demonstrated expertise across 14 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and building and construction contracts.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Liao Ruiyi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Liao Ruiyi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Liao Ruiyi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Liao Ruiyi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Liao Ruiyi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Restitution	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Liao Ruiyi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Failure of consideration	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Liao Ruiyi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Offer to Settle	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Liao Ruiyi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Liao Ruiyi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Liao Ruiyi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Liao Ruiyi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Pre-contract deposits	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Liao Ruiyi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Liao Ruiyi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Defect Claims	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Liao Ruiyi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Liao Ruiyi has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Oon & Bazul LLP	1 cases	50% of cases	Simpson Marine v Jiaravanon: Restitution for Failure of Consideration in Yacht Purchase Deposit(Jan 2019)
Bernard & Rada Law Corporation	1 cases	50% of cases	Management Corporation v Wintree: Offer to Settle & Indemnity Costs in Construction Defect Claim(May 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Liao Ruiyi's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	18.0 parties avg	8.0	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	18.0 parties avg	8.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Liao Ruiyi's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	38,000.00	19,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Simpson Marine v Jiaravanon: Restitution for Failure of Consideration in Yacht Purchase Deposit 22 Jan 2019 Simpson Marine (SEA) Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	22 Jan 2019	Simpson Marine (SEA) Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; costs of the appeal awarded to the appellant, fixed at $35,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Management Corporation v Wintree: Offer to Settle & Indemnity Costs in Construction Defect Claim 01 May 2018 The Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 3563 (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	01 May 2018	The Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 3563 (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the cost orders of the AR was dismissed. Costs of this appeal fixed at $3,000 (inclusive of disbursements) to be paid by the appellant to the respondent. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.