Lim Chor Pee

Lim Chor Pee is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2007. The lawyer has handled 13 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in misrepresentation and wills and probate. Their track record shows a 21.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 31% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated expertise across 62 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	8 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	5 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Property Law	5 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Strata Management	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Zoning, Planning and Land Use	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Amendment of Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Functus Officio	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Choice of Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Care	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Presumption of Advancement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joint Tenancy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rules of construction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Accounting	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intestacy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Dismissal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conveyancing Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Qualified Privilege	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Customer-Banker Relationship	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Foreign Exchange Transactions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Financial Investment Advice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Protection	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contested Wills	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conveyance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conveyancing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Eminent Domain	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Land Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Chor Pee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lim Chor Pee has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Chor Pee and Partners	8 cases	62% of cases	State of Johor v Tunku Alam Shah: Validity of Will & Bequest of 'State Property'(Aug 2005) Yip Jenn Yeuan v Ng Ah Chen: Contract Claim Arising from Road Accident Negligence(Jan 2005) Pacrim Investments v Tan Mui Keow Claire: Company Secretary's Power & Share Transfer Moratorium(Oct 2004)
Chor Pee & Partners	4 cases	31% of cases	Yeo Guan Chye v Lau Siew Kim: Resulting Trust, Joint Tenancy & Property Rights(Jan 2007) Terence Yeo v Lau Siew Kim: Amendment of Claim, Resulting Trust & Estate(Dec 2006) Candid Water Cooler v United Overseas Bank: Completion Date Dispute in Property Sale(May 2006)
Lim Chor Pee & Partners	1 cases	8% of cases	Wee Soon Kim Anthony v UBS AG: Amendment of Statement of Claim During Trial(Jun 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Chor Pee's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.9
Complex Cases: 4 (31%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	93.2 parties avg	3.2	69%
Partial	23.0 parties avg	3.0	15%
Won	36.0 parties avg	6.0	23%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	43.8 parties avg	3.8
2004	44.8 parties avg	4.8
2005	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2006	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2007	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Chor Pee's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	9(64%)	64%
Partial	2(14%)	14%
Won	3(21%)	21%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,559,302.69	194,912.848 cases	8

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	5 311	Lost: 3 cases (60.0%) Partial: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 1 cases (20.0%)
2004	4 31	Lost: 3 cases (75.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2005	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2006	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2007	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 13 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Yeo Guan Chye v Lau Siew Kim: Resulting Trust, Joint Tenancy & Property Rights 11 Jan 2007 Theodore Yeo Guan Huat @ Yeo Guan Huat (Plaintiff)Partial	11 Jan 2007	Theodore Yeo Guan Huat @ Yeo Guan Huat (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff in part50% of Minton Rise and 65% of 18 Jalan Tari Payong results back to the deceased’s estate.
2	Terence Yeo v Lau Siew Kim: Amendment of Claim, Resulting Trust & Estate 07 Dec 2006 Theodore Yeo Guan Huat @ Yeo Guan Huat (Plaintiff)Won	07 Dec 2006	Theodore Yeo Guan Huat @ Yeo Guan Huat (Plaintiff): Application grantedThe plaintiffs' application to further amend their statement of claim on the last day of trial was granted.
3	Candid Water Cooler v United Overseas Bank: Completion Date Dispute in Property Sale 15 May 2006 Candid Water Cooler Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	15 May 2006	Candid Water Cooler Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedCandid's claim was dismissed, and UOB was entitled to $128,499.69 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	State of Johor v Tunku Alam Shah: Validity of Will & Bequest of 'State Property' 30 Aug 2005 Tunku Alam Shah ibni Tunku Abdul Rahman (Defendant)Lost	30 Aug 2005	Tunku Alam Shah ibni Tunku Abdul Rahman (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe court held that the defendants are not “persons interested” for the purposes of s 23 of the Land Acquisition Act and have no standing to appeal to the Appeals Board constituted under s 19 of the said Act.
5	Yip Jenn Yeuan v Ng Ah Chen: Contract Claim Arising from Road Accident Negligence 30 Jan 2005 Yip Jenn Yeuan (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	30 Jan 2005	Yip Jenn Yeuan (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; costs to follow the event (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Pacrim Investments v Tan Mui Keow Claire: Company Secretary's Power & Share Transfer Moratorium 24 Oct 2004 Pacrim Investments Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	24 Oct 2004	Pacrim Investments Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application dismissedThe plaintiff's application was dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.
7	Godfrey Gerald QC v UBS AG: Costs Allocation & Court's Power to Clarify Orders 26 Aug 2004 Anthony Wee Soon Kim (Plaintiff)Lost	26 Aug 2004	Anthony Wee Soon Kim (Plaintiff): Application dismissedApplication to set aside order dismissed; Mr. Wee to bear the costs of the appeal personally (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Wee Soon Kim Anthony v UBS AG: Appeal on Misrepresentation & Duty of Care in Foreign Exchange Transactions 28 Jul 2004 Wee Soon Kim Anthony (Appellant)Lost	28 Jul 2004	Wee Soon Kim Anthony (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs awarded to the respondent.
9	MCST Plan No 2285 v Sum Lye Heng: Abuse of Process & Stay of Proceedings 29 Mar 2004 Sum Lye Heng (alias Lim Jessie) (Respondent)Won	29 Mar 2004	Sum Lye Heng (alias Lim Jessie) (Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Wee Soon Kim Anthony v UBS AG: Misrepresentation in Foreign Exchange Transactions and Banker's Duty of Care 07 Dec 2003 Wee Soon Kim Anthony (Plaintiff)Lost	07 Dec 2003	Wee Soon Kim Anthony (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Sum Lye Heng v Management Corporation: Abuse of Process & Strata Titles Act 19 Oct 2003 Sum Lye Heng (also known as Lim Jessie) (Plaintiff)Won	19 Oct 2003	Sum Lye Heng (also known as Lim Jessie) (Plaintiff): Application AllowedThe plaintiff's application to restrain the first defendant from prosecuting or proceeding with further action in Private Summons No 138 of 2003 was allowed.
12	Wee Soon Kim Anthony v UBS AG: Amendment of Statement of Claim During Trial 05 Jun 2003 Wee Soon Kim Anthony (Plaintiff)Lost	05 Jun 2003	Wee Soon Kim Anthony (Plaintiff): Application DismissedPlaintiff's application to amend his statement of claim was dismissed, and he was ordered to pay costs of $5000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
13	Yeo Nai Meng v Ei-Nets Ltd: Defamation & Wrongful Dismissal over Accounting Irregularities 08 May 2003 Liau Beng Chye (Defendant)Partial	08 May 2003	Liau Beng Chye (Defendant): Claim Dismissed in partClaim dismissed in part. The court found that the communication by LBC of the 3 Reports to the directors of Ei-Nets was covered by qualified privilege.