Lim Fung Peen

Lim Fung Peen is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2005. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in winding up and injunctions. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 60% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lim Fung Peen has demonstrated expertise across 21 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and winding up.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	5 cases	15% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Lim Fung Peen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Fung Peen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Fung Peen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Lim Fung Peen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Fung Peen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Fung Peen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Fung Peen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Fung Peen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lim Fung Peen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Fung Peen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Fung Peen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
CPF Contributions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Fung Peen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent Trading	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Fung Peen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Full and Frank Disclosure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Fung Peen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Preferential Payments	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Fung Peen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lim Fung Peen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Oppression	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Fung Peen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Fung Peen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Fung Peen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Fung Peen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Fung Peen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lim Fung Peen has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Lim Ang John and Tan LLC	2 cases	40% of cases	Tang Yoke Kheng v Lek Benedict: Stay of Bankruptcy Proceedings Due to Liquidator's Action(Nov 2005) Tang Yoke Kheng v Lek Benedict: Fraudulent Trading & Winding Up Dispute(May 2005)
John Tan and Chan	2 cases	40% of cases	Tang Yoke Kheng v Lek Benedict: Directors' Liability for Company Debts under Companies Act s 340(1)(Sep 2004) Tang Yoke Kheng v Lek Benedict: Injunctions, Full Disclosure, and Companies Act Violations(Apr 2004)
John Tan & Chan	1 cases	20% of cases	Chew Eu Hock Construction v Central Provident Fund Board: Scheme of Arrangement & Priority of CPF Contributions(Sep 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Fung Peen's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.6
Complex Cases: 3 (60%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.7 parties avg	2.7	40%
Won	34.0 parties avg	4.0	60%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2005	23.5 parties avg	3.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Fung Peen's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(40%)	40%
Won	3(60%)	60%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	12,000.00	4,000.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2005	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Tang Yoke Kheng v Lek Benedict: Stay of Bankruptcy Proceedings Due to Liquidator's Action 13 Nov 2005 Lim Wee Chuan (Petitioning Creditor, Appellant)Lost	13 Nov 2005	Lim Wee Chuan (Petitioning Creditor, Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against the stay of bankruptcy proceedings was dismissed with costs. Currency assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
2	Tang Yoke Kheng v Lek Benedict: Fraudulent Trading & Winding Up Dispute 12 May 2005 Lim Wee Chuan (Respondent)Won	12 May 2005	Lim Wee Chuan (Respondent): Judgment in favour of RespondentThe court found no evidence of fraud against the respondent.
3	Tang Yoke Kheng v Lek Benedict: Directors' Liability for Company Debts under Companies Act s 340(1) 26 Sep 2004 Lim Wee Chuan (Defendant)Won	26 Sep 2004	Lim Wee Chuan (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court found no evidence of fraudulent trading against the defendant.
4	Tang Yoke Kheng v Lek Benedict: Injunctions, Full Disclosure, and Companies Act Violations 27 Apr 2004 Lim Wee Chuan (Defendant)Won	27 Apr 2004	Lim Wee Chuan (Defendant): Interim orders set asideInterim orders against the defendant were set aside, and the plaintiff was ordered to pay costs of $6,000 to the first and second defendants, as well as individual disbursements. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
5	Chew Eu Hock Construction v Central Provident Fund Board: Scheme of Arrangement & Priority of CPF Contributions 07 Sep 2003 Central Provident Fund Board (Defendant)Lost	07 Sep 2003	Central Provident Fund Board (Defendant): Bound by the scheme of arrangementThe court ordered that the Central Provident Fund Board be bound by the terms of the scheme of arrangement. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.