Lim Jian Yi

Lim Jian Yi is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 57.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 14% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lim Jian Yi has demonstrated expertise across 30 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	6 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Lim Jian Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	5 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Jian Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Lim Jian Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Lim Jian Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Lim Jian Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lim Jian Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Jian Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Jian Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Workers Compensation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Jian Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Jian Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Jian Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Jian Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Debt Repayment Scheme	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Jian Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Jian Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Jian Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Jian Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Jian Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Jian Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Jian Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Jian Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Child Sexual Abuse	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Jian Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Central Provident Fund Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Jian Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Regime	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Jian Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Reopening of concluded criminal appeal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Jian Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Jian Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Jian Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Jian Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Jian Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Jian Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Jian Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lim Jian Yi has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	6 cases	86% of cases	Public Prosecutor v CDL: Sentencing for Sexual Assault of a Minor(May 2022) PP v Kishor Kumar & Pung Ah Kiang: Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act, Admissibility of Statements(Feb 2022) Moad Fadzir v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Common Intention, and Abetment under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Nov 2019)
Insolvency & Public Trustee’s Office	1 cases	14% of cases	Madina Beevi v M Akbar: Bankruptcy Order Appeal Based on IRDA s 316(3)(e)(Aug 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Jian Yi's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 1 (14%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.5 parties avg	2.5	29%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	14%
Won	42.8 parties avg	2.8	57%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Jian Yi's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(29%)	29%
Neutral	1(14%)	14%
Won	4(57%)	57%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2022	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Madina Beevi v M Akbar: Bankruptcy Order Appeal Based on IRDA s 316(3)(e) 01 Aug 2024 Official Assignee (Non-party)Neutral	01 Aug 2024	Official Assignee (Non-party): NeutralThe Official Assignee was a non-party to the appeal and took a neutral stance (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Public Prosecutor v CDL: Sentencing for Sexual Assault of a Minor 22 May 2022 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	22 May 2022	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe accused was sentenced to 18 years' imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane.
3	PP v Kishor Kumar & Pung Ah Kiang: Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act, Admissibility of Statements 03 Feb 2022 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	03 Feb 2022	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe Prosecution successfully convicted both accused on their respective charges.
4	Moad Fadzir v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Common Intention, and Abetment under the Misuse of Drugs Act 24 Nov 2019 Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	24 Nov 2019	Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe Prosecution's appeal against the acquittal of Zuraimy on the original trafficking charge was dismissed.
5	PP v Jurong Country Club: CPFA, Employee Definition & CPF Contribution 11 Jun 2019 Public Prosecutor (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	11 Jun 2019	Public Prosecutor (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Prosecution's appeal against the District Judge’s dismissal of its application for payment of arrears in contributions and interest under s 61B(1) CPFA was dismissed.
6	Public Prosecutor v Aishamudin: Trafficking Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 20 Jan 2019 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	20 Jan 2019	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Guilty verdict for AishamudinAishamudin was found guilty of trafficking diamorphine.
7	Abdul Kahar bin Othman v Public Prosecutor: Reopening of Criminal Appeal & Constitutionality of Misuse of Drugs Act 24 Oct 2018 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	24 Oct 2018	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Motion DismissedThe respondent successfully opposed the applicant's criminal motion.