Lim Kia Tong

Lim Kia Tong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in sentencing and criminal law.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lim Kia Tong has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in professional ethics and sentencing.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Professional Ethics	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lim Kia Tong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Kia Tong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Kia Tong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Kia Tong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Kia Tong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Kia Tong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Kia Tong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Kia Tong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Kia Tong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Young Offenders	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Kia Tong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice1% relevance score	Lim Kia Tong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Lasting Power of Attorney	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Kia Tong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice1% relevance score	Lim Kia Tong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice1% relevance score	Lim Kia Tong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Professional Misconduct	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Kia Tong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Principles	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Kia Tong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Newton hearings	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Kia Tong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Lim Kia Tong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Mentally disordered offenders	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Kia Tong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Collections	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice1% relevance score	Lim Kia Tong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lim Kia Tong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice1% relevance score	Lim Kia Tong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lim Kia Tong has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Hin Tat Augustine & Partners	2 cases	67% of cases	Ho Mei Xia Hannah v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence for Offences Against Public Servants(Sep 2019) Law Society v Sum Chong Mun: Professional Misconduct in Lasting Power of Attorney Certification(Apr 2017)
Lim Kia Tong & Partners	1 cases	33% of cases	Soong Hee Sin v Public Prosecutor: Appeal on Sentence for Criminal Breach of Trust(Mar 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Kia Tong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.5 parties avg	2.5	67%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Kia Tong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Partial	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ho Mei Xia Hannah v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence for Offences Against Public Servants 09 Sep 2019 Ho Mei Xia Hannah (Appellant, Applicant)Lost	09 Sep 2019	Ho Mei Xia Hannah (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the sentences imposed by the District Judge was dismissed.
2	Law Society v Sum Chong Mun: Professional Misconduct in Lasting Power of Attorney Certification 10 Apr 2017 SUM CHONG MUN (Respondent)Lost	10 Apr 2017	SUM CHONG MUN (Respondent): Disciplinary ActionFound guilty of professional misconduct and suspended for one year, with costs awarded to the Law Society (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Soong Hee Sin v Public Prosecutor: Appeal on Sentence for Criminal Breach of Trust 18 Mar 2001 Soong Hee Sin (Appellant)Partial	18 Mar 2001	Soong Hee Sin (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed; sentence reduced from 15 months to nine months' imprisonment (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).