Lim Lay See

Lim Lay See is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2013. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in easements and property law. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 67% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lim Lay See has demonstrated expertise across 12 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and easements.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	19% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Lim Lay See has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 19% of their total caseload.
Easements	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Lim Lay See has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Lay See has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Lay See has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Lay See has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Goods Sold and Delivered	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Lay See has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Services Rendered	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lim Lay See has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Overpayment	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Lay See has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Lay See has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Course of Dealings	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lim Lay See has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Land Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Lay See has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Lay See has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lim Lay See has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
David Ong & Co.	1 cases	33% of cases	Stone World Sdn Bhd v Engareh (S) Pte Ltd: Dispute over Payment for Marble Fabrication in Marina Bay Sands Project(Jan 2013)
Choo and Lim LLC	1 cases	33% of cases	Wong Yack Yoon v Wong Ah Chen: Easement of Access and Right to Park on Vacant Land(Apr 2005)
Choo & Lim LLC	1 cases	33% of cases	Wong Ah Chen v Wong Yack Yoon: Land Ownership Dispute over Shared Property Rights(Sep 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Lay See's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.6
Complex Cases: 2 (67%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.3 parties avg	3.3	67%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2005	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Lay See's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Partial	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	481,031.63	481,031.631 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Stone World Sdn Bhd v Engareh (S) Pte Ltd: Dispute over Payment for Marble Fabrication in Marina Bay Sands Project 23 Jan 2013 Stone World Sdn Bhd (Plaintiff)Lost	23 Jan 2013	Stone World Sdn Bhd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for $481,031.63 for goods sold and delivered and services rendered was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Wong Yack Yoon v Wong Ah Chen: Easement of Access and Right to Park on Vacant Land 05 Apr 2005 Goh Yew Pong (alias Wu Yu Peng) (Respondent)Lost	05 Apr 2005	Goh Yew Pong (alias Wu Yu Peng) (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; original orders set aside.
3	Wong Ah Chen v Wong Yack Yoon: Land Ownership Dispute over Shared Property Rights 15 Sep 2004 Goh Yew Pong (alias Wu Yu Peng) (Applicant)Partial	15 Sep 2004	Goh Yew Pong (alias Wu Yu Peng) (Applicant): Claim Granted in PartDeclaration that the Applicants are owners of a one-half equal undivided share of Lot 1031N of Mukim 24 granted. Order that Wong Yack Yoon and Ho Choon Mun remove a white wall and an extension thereto granted. Prayers (c) and (d) adjourned pending clarification from the Singapore Land Authority.