Lim Lee Ling Colleen

Lim Lee Ling Colleen is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in settlement agreement and valuation.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lim Lee Ling Colleen has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in property law and settlement agreement.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Property Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Lee Ling Colleen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Lee Ling Colleen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Lee Ling Colleen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Valuation	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Lee Ling Colleen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Lee Ling Colleen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Lee Ling Colleen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Lee Ling Colleen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Estate	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lim Lee Ling Colleen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lim Lee Ling Colleen has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Union Law LLP	1 cases	100% of cases	Quek Kwee Kee v Quek Khuay Chuah: Specific Performance & Valuation of Joo Chiat Properties(Jul 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Lee Ling Colleen's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Lee Ling Colleen's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Quek Kwee Kee v Quek Khuay Chuah: Specific Performance & Valuation of Joo Chiat Properties 15 Jul 2014 Quek Khuay Chuah (Defendant)Lost	15 Jul 2014	Quek Khuay Chuah (Defendant): Specific Performance OrderedDefendant ordered to sell his shares in the Joo Chiat properties. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.