Lim Min

Lim Min is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 24 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in negligence and professional conduct. Their track record shows a 29.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 6 complex cases, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lim Min has demonstrated expertise across 96 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and medical malpractice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	11 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 11 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	8 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	5 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	5 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Informed consent	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Pulmonary Fat Embolism	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Ethics	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Proprietary Estoppel	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice13% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Causation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings (Medical)	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dentistry and dental practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Incorporation by reference	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Implied term	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interlocutory injunction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders’ dispute	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intestate succession	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Professional Ethics	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal loan	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liposuction Complications	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intoxication	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Freight Forwarding	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Confession and avoidance defence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Gynaecology	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Extended doctrine	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cardiothoracic Surgery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Casinos and Gambling	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Health Care	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Healthcare Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Powers of Attorney	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized100% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Patient Confidentiality	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Non est factum	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restraint of foreign proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Comity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Vexatious and oppressive conduct	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penalties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lim Min has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 13 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Straits Law Practice LLC	13 cases	54% of cases	Singapore Medical Council v. Looi Kok Poh: Professional Misconduct & Medical Leave(May 2019) Lodh v Boustead: Injunction for Breach of Contractual Directorship Right(Mar 2019) Ivanishvili v Credit Suisse: Forum Non Conveniens & Exclusive Jurisdiction in Trust Dispute(Jan 2019)
K&L Gates Straits Law LLC	8 cases	33% of cases	Amit Patel v Singapore Dental Council: Appeal on Professional Misconduct in Dentist Supervision(Jul 2024) EBS Flow Control Ltd v Greene, Tweed & Co Pte Ltd: Contractual Terms, Termination & Interpretation(Jun 2024) Ong Kian Peng Julian v Singapore Medical Council: Medical Professionals' Conduct & Disrepute to Profession(Dec 2022)
K&L Gates Stratis Law	1 cases	4% of cases	Re Fusionex Pte Ltd: Winding Up Application Under Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act(Feb 2024)
K&L Gates Straits Law LLP	1 cases	4% of cases	VVB v VVA: Appeal on Costs for Revocation of Lasting Power of Attorney(Jan 2022)
K&L Gates Straits Law	1 cases	4% of cases	Sheng Ling Huo v Orthosports@Novena: Medical Negligence and Informed Consent in Knee Replacement Surgery(Jul 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Min's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.5
Complex Cases: 6 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	125.4 parties avg	5.4	50%
Neutral	24.0 parties avg	4.0	8%
Partial	33.7 parties avg	3.7	13%
Won	72.9 parties avg	2.9	29%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	42.8 parties avg	2.8
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	46.7 parties avg	6.7
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	35.7 parties avg	5.7
2020	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2021	35.0 parties avg	5.0
2022	43.3 parties avg	3.3
2024	32.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Min's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	12(50%)	50%
Neutral	2(8%)	8%
Partial	3(13%)	13%
Won	7(29%)	29%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	16,422,600.24	1,173,042.8714 cases	14

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	4 112	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	4 4	Lost: 4 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2022	4 13	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)
2024	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 24 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Amit Patel v Singapore Dental Council: Appeal on Professional Misconduct in Dentist Supervision 23 Jul 2024 Amit Patel (Appellant)Partial	23 Jul 2024	Amit Patel (Appellant): Appeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against orders allowed in partAppeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against orders allowed in part, reducing the period of suspension from 15 to 12 months, and by setting aside the imposition of the penalty of $30,000. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	EBS Flow Control Ltd v Greene, Tweed & Co Pte Ltd: Contractual Terms, Termination & Interpretation 06 Jun 2024 EBS Flow Control Ltd (Claimant)Lost	06 Jun 2024	EBS Flow Control Ltd (Claimant): Claim DismissedEBS's claim for wrongful termination and breach of implied term was dismissed.
3	Re Fusionex Pte Ltd: Winding Up Application Under Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 26 Feb 2024 Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd (Other)Neutral	26 Feb 2024	Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd (Other): NeutralTook no position on the winding up.
4	Ong Kian Peng Julian v Singapore Medical Council: Medical Professionals' Conduct & Disrepute to Profession 01 Dec 2022 Ong Kian Peng Julian (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	01 Dec 2022	Ong Kian Peng Julian (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal Dismissed; Suspension IncreasedDr. Ong's appeal was dismissed, and his term of suspension was increased to two years.
5	Thamby Kannu Parvathi v S Geetha: Estate Distribution Dispute over Dunlop Street Property Sale Proceeds 30 Oct 2022 Thamby Kannu Parvathi (Plaintiff)Won	30 Oct 2022	Thamby Kannu Parvathi (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffThe court declared the Gift Document invalid and ordered the defendants to pay the Plaintiff $1,366,377.62 plus interest from 10 April 2017 at the statutory rate of 5.33% until payment. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Sheng Ling Huo v Orthosports@Novena: Medical Negligence and Informed Consent in Knee Replacement Surgery 11 Jul 2022 David Paul Bell (Respondent)Won	11 Jul 2022	David Paul Bell (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	VVB v VVA: Appeal on Costs for Revocation of Lasting Power of Attorney 05 Jan 2022 VVA (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	05 Jan 2022	VVA (Respondent, Plaintiff): Costs AwardedCosts to be paid by the appellant, fixed by the District Judge (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Foo Chee Boon Edward v Seto Wei Meng: Negligence in Liposuction and Fat Transfer Procedure 27 Sep 2021 Foo Chee Boon Edward (Appellant)Partial	27 Sep 2021	Foo Chee Boon Edward (Appellant): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal on liability dismissed; appeal on quantum allowed in part.
9	PT Karya Indo Batam v Wang Zhenwen: Anti-Suit Injunction for Batam Project Dispute 12 Jul 2021 Rich Capital Holdings Limited (formerly known as Infinio Group Limited) (Defendant)Neutral	12 Jul 2021	Rich Capital Holdings Limited (formerly known as Infinio Group Limited) (Defendant): Anti-suit injunction grantedBenefits from the anti-suit injunction granted to OBPL.
10	Seto Wei Meng v Foo Chee Boon Edward: Stay of Bankruptcy Proceedings & Negligence in Liposuction 04 Jul 2021 Foo Chee Boon Edward (Defendant)Lost	04 Jul 2021	Foo Chee Boon Edward (Defendant): Stay Application dismissedThe Stay Application was dismissed in its entirety. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
11	Seto Wei Meng v Foo Chee Boon Edward: Negligence in Liposuction and Fat Transfer Procedure 25 Nov 2020 Foo Chee Boon Edward (Defendant)Lost	25 Nov 2020	Foo Chee Boon Edward (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant; damages awarded in the amount of $5,599,557.48 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
12	Singapore Medical Council v. Looi Kok Poh: Professional Misconduct & Medical Leave 26 May 2019 Looi Kok Poh (Respondent, Appellant)Won	26 May 2019	Looi Kok Poh (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal AllowedDr. Looi's appeal was allowed, and his conviction was set aside.
13	Lodh v Boustead: Injunction for Breach of Contractual Directorship Right 17 Mar 2019 Debotosh Lodh (Plaintiff)Lost	17 Mar 2019	Debotosh Lodh (Plaintiff): Application dismissedApplication for an injunction was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	Ivanishvili v Credit Suisse: Forum Non Conveniens & Exclusive Jurisdiction in Trust Dispute 17 Jan 2019 Bera Ivanishvili (Plaintiff)Lost	17 Jan 2019	Bera Ivanishvili (Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the Senior Assistant Registrar’s orders was dismissed.
15	Resorts World v Lee Fook Kheun: Casino Credit Facility, Intoxication & Contract Rescission 30 Jul 2018 Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	30 Jul 2018	Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff in the amount of $5,930,595.00 plus interest (currency assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
16	Alphire Group Pte Ltd v Law Chau Loon: Duty to Account and Burden of Proof in Trust Dispute 15 Nov 2017 Law Chau Loon (Defendant)Lost	15 Nov 2017	Law Chau Loon (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant in the amount of SGD 3,526,048.71 plus interest. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	Jen Shek Wei v Singapore Medical Council: Appeal Against Disciplinary Tribunal's Decision on Professional Misconduct 12 Nov 2017 JEN SHEK WEI (Applicant)Lost	12 Nov 2017	JEN SHEK WEI (Applicant): Appeal DismissedDr. Jen's appeal against the Disciplinary Tribunal's decision was dismissed.
18	Hii Chii Kok v Ooi Peng Jin: Medical Negligence, Standard of Care, Doctor's Duty of Advice 11 May 2017 Hii Chii Kok (Appellant)Lost	11 May 2017	Hii Chii Kok (Appellant): Appeal Dismissed in its EntiretyAppeal dismissed with costs to the respondents (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
19	Antariksa Logistics v Nurdian Cuaca: Res Judicata & Striking Out Application 27 Mar 2017 FASTINDO (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD (Plaintiff)Lost	27 Mar 2017	FASTINDO (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD (Plaintiff): Claims Struck OutClaims against this party were struck out.
20	Hii Chii Kok v Ooi Peng Jin London Lucien: Medical Negligence, Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors, Bolam-Bolitho Test 21 Feb 2016 Hii Chii Kok (Plaintiff)Lost	21 Feb 2016	Hii Chii Kok (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claims were dismissed in total.
21	Nithia v Buthmanaban: Proprietary Estoppel & Purchase Money Resulting Trust Dispute 18 Oct 2015 KRISHNAVANNY D/O VAITHILINGAM THE ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF PONNUSAMY SIVAPAKIAM, DECEASED (Respondent, Defendant)Won	18 Oct 2015	KRISHNAVANNY D/O VAITHILINGAM THE ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF PONNUSAMY SIVAPAKIAM, DECEASED (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the part of the Judgment holding that the plaintiff was entitled to relief on the ground of proprietary estoppel was set aside. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
22	CKR Contract Services v Asplenium Land: Enforceability of Clause Restricting Performance Bond Calls Based on Unconscionability 21 Apr 2015 CKR Contract Services Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	21 Apr 2015	CKR Contract Services Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedCKR's appeal against the Judge’s decision was dismissed.
23	Uwe Klima v Singapore Medical Council: Professional Misconduct & Negligence in Cardioplegia Administration 12 Apr 2015 Uwe Klima (Appellant)Won	12 Apr 2015	Uwe Klima (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal against the decision of a Disciplinary Committee was allowed.
24	Buthmanaban v Krishnavanny: Proprietary Estoppel & Beneficial Interest in Intestate Estate 03 Feb 2015 Krishnavanny d/o Vaithilingam (administratrix of the estate of Ponnusamy Sivapakiam, deceased) (Defendant)Partial	03 Feb 2015	Krishnavanny d/o Vaithilingam (administratrix of the estate of Ponnusamy Sivapakiam, deceased) (Defendant): Claim partially successful againstThe plaintiff's claim was partially successful against the first defendant, with the plaintiff being awarded 21.43% of the net sale proceeds of the property (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).