Lim Min Li Amanda

Lim Min Li Amanda is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in recognition of foreign judgments and injunctions. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 29% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lim Min Li Amanda has demonstrated expertise across 36 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Lim Min Li Amanda has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Lim Min Li Amanda has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Lim Min Li Amanda has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Lim Min Li Amanda has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Lim Min Li Amanda has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Min Li Amanda has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Min Li Amanda has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Min Li Amanda has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Recognition of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Min Li Amanda has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Min Li Amanda has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Min Li Amanda has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Min Li Amanda has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Min Li Amanda has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Min Li Amanda has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Min Li Amanda has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Min Li Amanda has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restraint of foreign proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Min Li Amanda has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Comity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Min Li Amanda has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Vexatious and oppressive conduct	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Min Li Amanda has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Min Li Amanda has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Min Li Amanda has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Min Li Amanda has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Min Li Amanda has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Min Li Amanda has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Min Li Amanda has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Min Li Amanda has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Min Li Amanda has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mutual Legal Assistance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Min Li Amanda has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Min Li Amanda has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sham Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Min Li Amanda has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Min Li Amanda has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Min Li Amanda has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Min Li Amanda has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Min Li Amanda has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Min Li Amanda has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Min Li Amanda has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lim Min Li Amanda has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	7 cases	100% of cases	Ha Chi Kut v Chen Aun-Li Andrew: Enforcement of Foreign Judgment under REFJA(Jun 2022) Lew v Nargolwala: Agency, Contract Formation, Trusts & Conflict of Laws(Feb 2021) Steep Rise Ltd v Attorney-General: Duty of Full Disclosure & Enforcement of Foreign Confiscation Order under MACMA(Mar 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Min Li Amanda's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.9
Complex Cases: 2 (29%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	42.5 parties avg	2.5	57%
Won	44.8 parties avg	4.8	57%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	32.8 parties avg	2.8
2020	24.7 parties avg	4.7
2021	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Min Li Amanda's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(50%)	50%
Won	4(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	144,300.00	24,050.006 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	4 31	Lost: 3 cases (75.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ha Chi Kut v Chen Aun-Li Andrew: Enforcement of Foreign Judgment under REFJA 26 Jun 2022 Ha Chi Kut (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	26 Jun 2022	Ha Chi Kut (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed, Registration Order to stand. Costs fixed at S$8,000 (inclusive of disbursements) to Mdm Ha. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Lew v Nargolwala: Agency, Contract Formation, Trusts & Conflict of Laws 09 Feb 2021 Aparna Nargolwala (Respondent, Appellant)Won	09 Feb 2021	Aparna Nargolwala (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; Lew ordered to pay costs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Steep Rise Ltd v Attorney-General: Duty of Full Disclosure & Enforcement of Foreign Confiscation Order under MACMA 23 Mar 2020 Steep Rise Limited (Appellant)Lost	23 Mar 2020	Steep Rise Limited (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Steep Rise Limited ordered to pay costs of $40,000 to the Attorney-General (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Lew v Nargolwala: Breach of Contract & Agency Dispute over Andara Resort Villa 04 Feb 2020 Aparna Nargolwala (Defendant)Won	04 Feb 2020	Aparna Nargolwala (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe action against the defendant was dismissed as the court found no binding oral contract existed.
5	Adinop Co Ltd v Rovithai Ltd: Breach of Confidence & Confidentiality Agreement in Distributor Termination 14 Nov 2019 DSM Singapore Industrial Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	14 Nov 2019	DSM Singapore Industrial Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed against DSM Singapore. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Akfel Commodities v. Townsend: Conditional Leave to Defend & Sham Contract Allegations 29 Jul 2019 Akfel Commodities Turkey Holding Anonim Sirketi (Appellant)Lost	29 Jul 2019	Akfel Commodities Turkey Holding Anonim Sirketi (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the imposition of a condition for leave to defend was dismissed.
7	Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar v Jhaveri Darsan Jitendra: Anti-Suit Injunction & Natural Forum Dispute 25 Jul 2019 Jhaveri Darsan Jitendra (Respondent, Defendant)Lost	25 Jul 2019	Jhaveri Darsan Jitendra (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; ordered to pay the appellant the costs of the appeal and the two applications for leave to adduce fresh evidence in the appeal, namely CA/SUM 38/2019 and CA/SUM 39/2019, fixed at $60,000 inclusive of disbursements. The respondent shall also bear the costs below fixed at $36,300 inclusive of disbursements. The usual consequential orders will apply. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.