Lim Ming Hui Eunice

Lim Ming Hui Eunice is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in patents and trademarks.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lim Ming Hui Eunice has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and patents.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	3 cases	16% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Lim Ming Hui Eunice has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 16% of their total caseload.
Patents	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Ming Hui Eunice has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Lim Ming Hui Eunice has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Ming Hui Eunice has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lim Ming Hui Eunice has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Patent Revocation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Ming Hui Eunice has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Ming Hui Eunice has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Ming Hui Eunice has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Ming Hui Eunice has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Ming Hui Eunice has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Trademark Infringement	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Ming Hui Eunice has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Adduction of Further Evidence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Ming Hui Eunice has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Unfair Competition	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Ming Hui Eunice has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lim Ming Hui Eunice has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	5 cases	100% of cases	Martek v Cargill: Patent Revocation Appeal - Adducing Further Evidence(Dec 2010) Pioneers & Leaders v Asia Pacific: Copyright Infringement & Passing Off in Horse-Racing Publication(Jul 2010) Martek Biosciences Corp v Cargill: Patent Revocation Appeal - Adducing Further Evidence(May 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Ming Hui Eunice's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	52.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	32.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Ming Hui Eunice's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	5,500.00	1,833.333 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Martek v Cargill: Patent Revocation Appeal - Adducing Further Evidence 27 Dec 2010 Martek Biosciences Corp (Appellant)Lost	27 Dec 2010	Martek Biosciences Corp (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs and the usual consequential orders. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Pioneers & Leaders v Asia Pacific: Copyright Infringement & Passing Off in Horse-Racing Publication 29 Jul 2010 Asia Pacific Publishing Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	29 Jul 2010	Asia Pacific Publishing Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedDefendant’s counterclaim being completely unmeritorious is dismissed with costs which, as with the costs of the plaintiff’s claim, shall be taxed on a standard basis unless otherwise agreed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Martek Biosciences Corp v Cargill: Patent Revocation Appeal - Adducing Further Evidence 02 May 2010 Martek Biosciences Corp (Applicant, Appellant)Lost	02 May 2010	Martek Biosciences Corp (Applicant, Appellant): Application dismissed with costsApplication to adduce further evidence was dismissed with costs of $5,500 (inclusive of disbursements) to be paid by the Applicant to the Respondents as costs of this application. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Mobil Petroleum v Hyundai Mobis: Trademark Registration Refusal Appeal 04 Aug 2009 Mobil Petroleum Company, Inc (Appellant)Lost	04 Aug 2009	Mobil Petroleum Company, Inc (Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe appeal against the registration of the 'MOBIS' trademark was dismissed.
5	Mobil Petroleum v Hyundai Mobis: Trade Mark Registration Refusal - Bad Faith & Likelihood of Confusion 29 Jun 2008 Mobil Petroleum Co, Inc (Appellant)Lost	29 Jun 2008	Mobil Petroleum Co, Inc (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.