Lim Mingguan

Lim Mingguan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 10 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in restructuring and dissolution and civil practice. Their track record shows a 30.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 40% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lim Mingguan has demonstrated expertise across 59 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	6 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	5 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	4 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Share Pledge	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Comity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interim Judicial Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bills of Exchange Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joint Accounts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assignment and attachment of money held by bank	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Video Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Formation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Directors and Officers Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Gaming Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Mingguan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lim Mingguan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Providence Law Asia LLC	8 cases	80% of cases	Atlas Equifin v Electronic Cash: Winding Up Application Dispute(Oct 2022) Re Hodlnaut Pte Ltd: Interim Judicial Management Application by Cryptocurrency Platform(Aug 2022) Timing Limited v Tay Toh Hin: Garnishee Orders & Joint Accounts Dispute(Jan 2021)
Drew & Napier LLC	2 cases	20% of cases	DJY v DJZ: Injunction to Restrain Performance Bond Call \| Construction Dispute(Nov 2024) Beckkett Pte Ltd v Deutsche Bank AG: Anti-Suit Injunction & Abuse of Court Process(Dec 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Mingguan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.4
Complex Cases: 4 (40%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	24.5 parties avg	4.5	20%
Neutral	24.5 parties avg	4.5	20%
Partial	27.0 parties avg	7.0	20%
Unknown	15.0 parties avg	5.0	10%
Won	32.8 parties avg	2.8	30%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	35.7 parties avg	5.7
2020	24.5 parties avg	4.5
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	25.5 parties avg	5.5
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Mingguan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(20%)	20%
Neutral	2(20%)	20%
Partial	2(20%)	20%
Unknown	1(10%)	10%
Won	3(30%)	30%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,500.00	500.005 cases	5
USD	9,799,221.94	9,799,221.941 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	3 12	Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 2 cases (66.7%)
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Unknown: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 10 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	DJY v DJZ: Injunction to Restrain Performance Bond Call \| Construction Dispute 25 Nov 2024 DJZ (Defendant)Won	25 Nov 2024	DJZ (Defendant): Application for injunction dismissedApplication for injunction against DJZ and the Bank dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Atlas Equifin v Electronic Cash: Winding Up Application Dispute 12 Oct 2022 Monica Kochhar (Other)	12 Oct 2022	Monica Kochhar (Other): -
3	Re Hodlnaut Pte Ltd: Interim Judicial Management Application by Cryptocurrency Platform 30 Aug 2022 Brian Gothong Tan (Other)Neutral	30 Aug 2022	Brian Gothong Tan (Other): NeutralBrian Gothong Tan was mentioned as a non-party.
4	Timing Limited v Tay Toh Hin: Garnishee Orders & Joint Accounts Dispute 10 Jan 2021 Tay Cindy Iwasaki (Respondent)Won	10 Jan 2021	Tay Cindy Iwasaki (Respondent): Application to garnish joint accounts dismissedApplication to garnish the moneys standing credit in the two joint accounts was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	The Star Entertainment QLD Ltd v Wong Yew Choy: Gambling Debt, Illegality & Public Policy 06 Jul 2020 Wong Yew Choy (Defendant)Won	06 Jul 2020	Wong Yew Choy (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe claim against the Defendant was dismissed due to Section 5(2) of the Civil Law Act. Assumed currency is SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	The Micro Tellers Network v Cheng Yi Han: Mareva Injunction & Fraudulent Misrepresentation 23 Jun 2020 Cheng Yi Han (Zhong Yihan) (Defendant)Lost	23 Jun 2020	Cheng Yi Han (Zhong Yihan) (Defendant): Worldwide Mareva injunction granted against assetsWorldwide Mareva injunction granted against the Defendants’ assets up to the value of US$9,799,221.94 (assumed USD, as the judgment refers to amounts in USD).
7	Macquarie Bank v. Graceland Industry: Commodity Swap, Mistake & Fiduciary Duty 03 May 2018 STEPHEN BECHER WOLFE (Defendant)Neutral	03 May 2018	STEPHEN BECHER WOLFE (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim against the second defendant in counterclaim was dismissed.
8	Bachmeer Capital v Ong Chih Ching: Video Link Evidence in International Commercial Dispute 12 Feb 2018 DMITRIY SHPORT (Defendant)Partial	12 Feb 2018	DMITRIY SHPORT (Defendant): Application allowed in part and dismissed in part.Application allowed in part and dismissed in part.
9	Macquarie Bank v. Graceland Industry: Amendment of Pleadings in Commodity Swap Dispute 23 Jan 2018 STEPHEN BECHER WOLFE (Defendant in Counterclaim)Partial	23 Jan 2018	STEPHEN BECHER WOLFE (Defendant in Counterclaim): Costs awardedCosts of the application and costs in relation to consequential amendments to the pleadings were ordered to be paid by Graceland to Mr. Wolfe. Costs for the first hearing were fixed at $1,500, including disbursements. Additional costs for the second and third hearings were fixed at $1,000. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Beckkett Pte Ltd v Deutsche Bank AG: Anti-Suit Injunction & Abuse of Court Process 19 Dec 2010 Beckkett Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	19 Dec 2010	Beckkett Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the anti-suit injunction was dismissed.