Lim Pei Ling June

Lim Pei Ling June is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in shareholder disputes and gifts law. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lim Pei Ling June has demonstrated expertise across 42 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and trusts and estates.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Lim Pei Ling June has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Pei Ling June has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lim Pei Ling June has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Pei Ling June has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Lim Pei Ling June has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Lim Pei Ling June has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Pei Ling June has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Pei Ling June has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Pei Ling June has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Proprietary Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Pei Ling June has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restraining Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lim Pei Ling June has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Pei Ling June has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lim Pei Ling June has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Gifts Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Pei Ling June has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Pei Ling June has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Pei Ling June has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Pei Ling June has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholder Rights	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Pei Ling June has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Parenting	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Pei Ling June has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Pei Ling June has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Pei Ling June has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Pei Ling June has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Pei Ling June has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Pei Ling June has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Pei Ling June has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Pei Ling June has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Pei Ling June has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Pei Ling June has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Pei Ling June has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Gifts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Pei Ling June has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Lim Pei Ling June has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interim Maintenance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Pei Ling June has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Derivative action	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Pei Ling June has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Child Abduction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Pei Ling June has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Hague Convention	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Pei Ling June has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Pei Ling June has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Psychology	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Pei Ling June has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Pei Ling June has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Pei Ling June has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Pei Ling June has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Pei Ling June has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Pei Ling June has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lim Pei Ling June has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Eden Law Corporation	1 cases	25% of cases	BMM v BMN: Resulting Trusts, Gifts, and Proprietary Estoppel in Property Ownership Dispute(May 2017)
Tan Peng Chin LLC	1 cases	25% of cases	Sinwa SS (HK) Co Ltd v Morten Innhaug: Derivative Action & Director's Duties(May 2010)
One Legal LLC	1 cases	25% of cases	Sinwa SS (HK) Co Ltd v Nordic International Ltd: Appealability of 'No Order' in Summary Judgment(Jan 2015)
Patrick Tan LLC	1 cases	25% of cases	BDU v BDT: Hague Convention, International Child Abduction, Grave Risk of Psychological Harm(Feb 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Pei Ling June's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.3 parties avg	2.3	75%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Pei Ling June's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(75%)	75%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	26,500.00	13,250.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	BMM v BMN: Resulting Trusts, Gifts, and Proprietary Estoppel in Property Ownership Dispute 28 May 2017 BMN (Defendant, Plaintiff)Lost	28 May 2017	BMN (Defendant, Plaintiff): Originating Summons No 574 of 2015 DismissedBMN's claim that she and BMM each hold an equal beneficial interest in the Property, or alternatively a declaration that she holds a beneficial interest in the Property in a proportion calculated based on her various financial contributions is dismissed.
2	Sinwa SS (HK) Co Ltd v Nordic International Ltd: Appealability of 'No Order' in Summary Judgment 05 Jan 2015 Sinwa SS (HK) Co Ltd (Appellant)Lost	05 Jan 2015	Sinwa SS (HK) Co Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of $20,000 inclusive of disbursements to be paid to the 2nd Respondent. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	BDU v BDT: Hague Convention, International Child Abduction, Grave Risk of Psychological Harm 16 Feb 2014 BDT (Respondent)Won	16 Feb 2014	BDT (Respondent): Application AllowedApplication for the return of the child to Germany allowed, subject to specific undertakings.
4	Sinwa SS (HK) Co Ltd v Morten Innhaug: Derivative Action & Director's Duties 23 May 2010 Sinwa SS (HK) Co Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	23 May 2010	Sinwa SS (HK) Co Ltd (Plaintiff): Application dismissedApplication for leave to commence a derivative action was dismissed. Costs of S$6,500 were awarded to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.