Lim Qiu’en

Lim Qiu’en is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and cross-border insolvency. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lim Qiu’en has demonstrated expertise across 27 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and banking and finance.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Lim Qiu’en has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Qiu’en has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Qiu’en has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Qiu’en has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Qiu’en has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Qiu’en has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Cross-Border Insolvency	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Qiu’en has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Qiu’en has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Qiu’en has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Qiu’en has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Qiu’en has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Qiu’en has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Qiu’en has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Qiu’en has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Qiu’en has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Recognition of foreign insolvency proceedings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Qiu’en has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Qiu’en has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Letter of Credit Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Qiu’en has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Qiu’en has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Qiu’en has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Qiu’en has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
UNCITRAL Model Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Qiu’en has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bills of Exchange	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Qiu’en has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Inducing Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Qiu’en has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lim Qiu’en has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fictitious Purchase Scheme	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Qiu’en has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Qiu’en has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lim Qiu’en has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Damodara Ong LLC	2 cases	100% of cases	United Securities Sdn Bhd v United Overseas Bank: Cross-Border Insolvency & Recognition of Foreign Proceedings(Aug 2021) Bank of China v BP Singapore: Negligence, Fraud & Letter of Credit Dispute(May 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Qiu’en's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.7
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%
Neutral	15.0 parties avg	5.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	23.7 parties avg	3.7

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Qiu’en's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Neutral	1(50%)	50%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	United Securities Sdn Bhd v United Overseas Bank: Cross-Border Insolvency & Recognition of Foreign Proceedings 09 Aug 2021 Robert Teo Keng Tuan (Appellant)Lost	09 Aug 2021	Robert Teo Keng Tuan (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; no stay of Singapore proceedings granted.
2	Bank of China v BP Singapore: Negligence, Fraud & Letter of Credit Dispute 30 May 2021 Lim Chee Meng (Defendant)Neutral	30 May 2021	Lim Chee Meng (Defendant): NeutralWatching brief.