Lim Sai Nei

Lim Sai Nei is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2013. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contempt of court and costs. Their track record shows a 71.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lim Sai Nei has demonstrated expertise across 23 primary practice areas, with significant experience in constitutional law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Constitutional Law	7 cases	15% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Lim Sai Nei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	6 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Lim Sai Nei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Lim Sai Nei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Lim Sai Nei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Freedom of speech	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Lim Sai Nei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Lim Sai Nei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Lim Sai Nei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lim Sai Nei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Lim Sai Nei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Sai Nei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Patient Confidentiality	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lim Sai Nei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lim Sai Nei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Sai Nei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Sai Nei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Sai Nei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fair Criticism	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Sai Nei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Sai Nei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Sai Nei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Scandalising the court	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Sai Nei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Scandalising the judiciary	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Sai Nei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Election Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Sai Nei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Parliamentary Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Sai Nei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Sai Nei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lim Sai Nei has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	7 cases	100% of cases	Vellama v AG: Constitutionality of Vacant Seat & Prime Minister's Discretion(Jul 2013) Attorney-General v Vellama: Costs in Withdrawing Appeal for Judicial Review of Prime Minister's By-Election Discretion(Nov 2012) Vellama v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of By-Election Timing in Hougang SMC(Oct 2012)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Sai Nei's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	14%
Withdrawn	12.0 parties avg	2.0	14%
Won	52.0 parties avg	2.0	71%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Sai Nei's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(14%)	14%
Withdrawn	1(14%)	14%
Won	5(71%)	71%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	55,000.00	18,333.333 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Withdrawn: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Vellama v AG: Constitutionality of Vacant Seat & Prime Minister's Discretion 04 Jul 2013 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	04 Jul 2013	Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed. The court ordered each party to bear their own costs.
2	Attorney-General v Vellama: Costs in Withdrawing Appeal for Judicial Review of Prime Minister's By-Election Discretion 01 Nov 2012 Attorney-General (Appellant)Withdrawn	01 Nov 2012	Attorney-General (Appellant): Appeal WithdrawnThe Attorney-General withdrew the appeal against the Leave Order.
3	Vellama v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of By-Election Timing in Hougang SMC 31 Oct 2012 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	31 Oct 2012	Attorney-General (Respondent): Application DismissedApplication for judicial review dismissed; no order as to costs.
4	Vellama v Attorney-General: Application for Mandatory Order for By-Election in Hougang SMC 08 Apr 2012 Attorney-General (Respondent)Lost	08 Apr 2012	Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeal against leave unsuccessfulThe Attorney-General's appeal against the decision to grant leave was unsuccessful.
5	Shadrake Alan v Attorney-General: Contempt of Court for Scandalising the Judiciary 26 May 2011 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	26 May 2011	Attorney-General (Respondent): Judgment affirmedJudgment against Appellant affirmed.
6	Attorney-General v Shadrake Alan: Contempt of Court for Scandalising the Judiciary 15 Nov 2010 Attorney-General (Applicant)Won	15 Nov 2010	Attorney-General (Applicant): Judgment for ApplicantCosts fixed at $55,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Attorney-General v Shadrake Alan: Contempt of Court, Scandalizing the Judiciary 02 Nov 2010 Attorney-General (Applicant)Won	02 Nov 2010	Attorney-General (Applicant): Judgment for ApplicantMr. Shadrake found guilty of the offence of contempt by scandalising the court and convicted accordingly.