Lim Soo Peng

Lim Soo Peng is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in divorce and family law. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lim Soo Peng has demonstrated expertise across 25 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Lim Soo Peng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Soo Peng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Soo Peng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Soo Peng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Soo Peng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Soo Peng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Soo Peng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Soo Peng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Soo Peng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Soo Peng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Soo Peng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Soo Peng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Soo Peng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Soo Peng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Soo Peng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Soo Peng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Soo Peng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Soo Peng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Soo Peng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Soo Peng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Comity	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Soo Peng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Detention	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Soo Peng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Soo Peng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Restitutio in integrum	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Soo Peng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Soo Peng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lim Soo Peng has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Lim Soo Peng & Co LLC	1 cases	25% of cases	Sahara Energy v Chu Said Thong: Breach of Employment Agreements and Video Link Evidence(Dec 2020)
Lim Soo Peng & Co LLP	1 cases	25% of cases	Hamonangan Luis v Suntanto Sanny Suriaty: Division of Matrimonial Assets in Divorce Proceedings(Oct 2008)
Lim Soo Peng and Co	1 cases	25% of cases	Q & M Enterprises Sdn Bhd v Poh Kiat: Forum Non Conveniens & Summary Judgment(Aug 2005)
Lim Soo Peng & Co	1 cases	25% of cases	Pioneer Glory v P.T. GE Astra Finance: Damages for Wrongful Detention and Fall in Equipment Value(Feb 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Soo Peng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Soo Peng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Sahara Energy v Chu Said Thong: Breach of Employment Agreements and Video Link Evidence 08 Dec 2020 Chu Said Thong (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim)Won	08 Dec 2020	Chu Said Thong (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim): Application dismissedThe application by Sahara for video link evidence was dismissed, a favorable outcome for Chu. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction.
2	Hamonangan Luis v Suntanto Sanny Suriaty: Division of Matrimonial Assets in Divorce Proceedings 22 Oct 2008 Hamonangan Luis (Appellant)Partial	22 Oct 2008	Hamonangan Luis (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part, varying the orders related to the division of rental proceeds from the matrimonial flat and the Post Office Savings Bank (POSB) joint account.
3	Q & M Enterprises Sdn Bhd v Poh Kiat: Forum Non Conveniens & Summary Judgment 30 Aug 2005 Q & M Enterprises Sdn Bhd (Plaintiff)Lost	30 Aug 2005	Q & M Enterprises Sdn Bhd (Plaintiff): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Pioneer Glory v P.T. GE Astra Finance: Damages for Wrongful Detention and Fall in Equipment Value 14 Feb 2002 The Owners of the Ship or Vessel "Pioneer Glory" (Appellant)Lost	14 Feb 2002	The Owners of the Ship or Vessel "Pioneer Glory" (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.