Lim Swee Tee

Lim Swee Tee is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2016. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lim Swee Tee has demonstrated expertise across 12 primary practice areas, with significant experience in evidence law and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Evidence Law	5 cases	22% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Lim Swee Tee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 22% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	5 cases	22% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Lim Swee Tee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 22% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	3 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Swee Tee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Swee Tee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lim Swee Tee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Swee Tee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Swee Tee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Swee Tee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Swee Tee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Swee Tee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Controlled Drugs	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Swee Tee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Diplomatic Relations	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Lim Swee Tee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lim Swee Tee has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Lim Swee Tee & Co.	3 cases	60% of cases	PP v Hishamrudin: Trafficking Diamorphine & Misuse of Drugs Act(Apr 2016) Rusli Bin Sembayang v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Cannabis and Retracted Confession(Mar 2003) PP v Rusli bin Sembayang: Trafficking in Cannabis & Possession for Trafficking Purposes(Dec 2002)
Dhillon Dendroff & Partners	2 cases	40% of cases	PP v Mohamed Abdul Nasser & Ashok Kumar Giri: Trafficking of Cannabis(Apr 2001) Public Prosecutor v Solaiyan Arumugam: Rape and Molest Case(Apr 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Swee Tee's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.2
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	42.0 parties avg	2.0	80%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Swee Tee's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(80%)	80%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Hishamrudin: Trafficking Diamorphine & Misuse of Drugs Act 05 Apr 2016 Hishamrudin bin Mohd (Defendant)Lost	05 Apr 2016	Hishamrudin bin Mohd (Defendant): ConvictedAccused convicted on both charges and sentenced.
2	Rusli Bin Sembayang v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Cannabis and Retracted Confession 11 Mar 2003 Rusli Bin Sembayang (Appellant)Lost	11 Mar 2003	Rusli Bin Sembayang (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the conviction for trafficking cannabis was dismissed.
3	PP v Rusli bin Sembayang: Trafficking in Cannabis & Possession for Trafficking Purposes 30 Dec 2002 Rusli Bin Sembayang (Defendant)Lost	30 Dec 2002	Rusli Bin Sembayang (Defendant): GuiltyThe defendant was found guilty of the charge.
4	PP v Mohamed Abdul Nasser & Ashok Kumar Giri: Trafficking of Cannabis 25 Apr 2001 Mohamed Abdul Nasser bin Mahamood (Defendant)Won	25 Apr 2001	Mohamed Abdul Nasser bin Mahamood (Defendant): Discharged and AcquittedThe first accused was discharged and acquitted (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Public Prosecutor v Solaiyan Arumugam: Rape and Molest Case 25 Apr 2001 Solaiyan Arumugam (Defense)Lost	25 Apr 2001	Solaiyan Arumugam (Defense): Accused found guiltyAccused was sentenced to 10 years imprisonment and 12 strokes of the cane in respect the first charge and two years imprisonment and two strokes of the cane in respect of the third charge. The sentence of imprisonment in respect of the second charge should be served concurrently with that of the first.