Lim Tahn Lin Alfred

Lim Tahn Lin Alfred is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in trust law and settlement agreement. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 13% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lim Tahn Lin Alfred has demonstrated expertise across 32 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	6 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Lim Tahn Lin Alfred has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	5 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Lim Tahn Lin Alfred has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Lim Tahn Lin Alfred has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Lim Tahn Lin Alfred has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Lim Tahn Lin Alfred has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Tahn Lin Alfred has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Tahn Lin Alfred has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Tahn Lin Alfred has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Lim Tahn Lin Alfred has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Knowing Receipt	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Tahn Lin Alfred has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Tahn Lin Alfred has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Tahn Lin Alfred has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Tahn Lin Alfred has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Tahn Lin Alfred has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Tahn Lin Alfred has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Tahn Lin Alfred has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Tahn Lin Alfred has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Tahn Lin Alfred has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Beneficial Ownership	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Tahn Lin Alfred has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Workplace Safety and Health	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Tahn Lin Alfred has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory offence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Tahn Lin Alfred has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Purchase Price Resulting Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Tahn Lin Alfred has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Deed of Indemnity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lim Tahn Lin Alfred has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Implied authority of agent	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Tahn Lin Alfred has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Tahn Lin Alfred has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Tahn Lin Alfred has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lim Tahn Lin Alfred has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Tahn Lin Alfred has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Tahn Lin Alfred has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Tahn Lin Alfred has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lim Tahn Lin Alfred has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Tahn Lin Alfred has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lim Tahn Lin Alfred has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Fullerton Law Chambers LLC	7 cases	88% of cases	Debenho Pte Ltd v Envy Global Trading Pte Ltd: Stay of Civil Suit Pending Criminal Charges for Fraudulent Misrepresentation(Jan 2022) Star Group Est v Willsoon (FE): Breach of Contract & Sale of Goods Act(Sep 2020) Alphire Group Pte Ltd v Law Chau Loon: Implied Authority and Settlement Agreement Validity(May 2020)
Quahe Woo & Palmer LLC	1 cases	13% of cases	PP v GS Engineering: Workplace Safety, Health Act & Sentencing(Dec 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Tahn Lin Alfred's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 1 (13%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.5 parties avg	2.5	38%
Neutral	14.0 parties avg	4.0	13%
Won	42.5 parties avg	2.5	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	42.8 parties avg	2.8
2020	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Tahn Lin Alfred's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(38%)	38%
Neutral	1(13%)	13%
Won	4(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	257,500.00	36,785.717 cases	7

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	4 13	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Debenho Pte Ltd v Envy Global Trading Pte Ltd: Stay of Civil Suit Pending Criminal Charges for Fraudulent Misrepresentation 13 Jan 2022 Low Teck Dee (Plaintiff)Neutral	13 Jan 2022	Low Teck Dee (Plaintiff): Claim not stayedThe plaintiff's claim was not stayed pending the outcome of related criminal proceedings against the defendant.
2	Star Group Est v Willsoon (FE): Breach of Contract & Sale of Goods Act 01 Sep 2020 Willsoon (FE) Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	01 Sep 2020	Willsoon (FE) Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed. Willsoon's claim for $125,400 was dismissed.
3	Alphire Group Pte Ltd v Law Chau Loon: Implied Authority and Settlement Agreement Validity 18 May 2020 Law Chau Loon (Respondent)Won	18 May 2020	Law Chau Loon (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in favour of Law Chau Loon; Law Chau Loon awarded costs of $25,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Neo Aik Soo v. Neo Geek Kuan: Resulting Trusts & Beneficial Ownership Dispute 28 Nov 2019 Neo Aik Siong (Defendant)Lost	28 Nov 2019	Neo Aik Siong (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedCounterclaim dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Law Chau Loon v Alphire Group: Settlement Agreement & Implied Authority 26 Nov 2019 Law Chau Loon (Applicant)Won	26 Nov 2019	Law Chau Loon (Applicant): Application grantedApplication granted; the court declared that the settlement agreement made on 2 February 2019 was valid and binding on Alphire. Costs of S$7,500 awarded to the applicant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Red Star Marine Consultants v Personal Representatives: Fraud, Recipient Liability & Trust 03 Jun 2019 Manjit Kaur d/o Sardara Singh (Defendant)Won	03 Jun 2019	Manjit Kaur d/o Sardara Singh (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant; the plaintiff's claim for knowing receipt was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Red Star Marine Consultants Pte Ltd v Personal Representatives of the Estate of Satwant Kaur: Fraud and Misrepresentation Claim 30 Jan 2019 Manjit Kaur d/o Sardara Singh (Defendant)Won	30 Jan 2019	Manjit Kaur d/o Sardara Singh (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim against the second defendant was dismissed.
8	PP v GS Engineering: Workplace Safety, Health Act & Sentencing 14 Dec 2016 GS Engineering & Construction Corp (Respondent)Lost	14 Dec 2016	GS Engineering & Construction Corp (Respondent): Fine IncreasedFine increased from $150,000 to $250,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).