Lim Tean

Lim Tean is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 38 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in admiralty and maritime law and shipping law. Their track record shows a 18.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 6 complex cases, representing 16% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lim Tean has demonstrated expertise across 128 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	19 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 19 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	19 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 19 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	10 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	10 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	9 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	8 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	8 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	8 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	7 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Causation	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice31% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice17% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bailment	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conversion	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Carriage of goods by sea	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Libel, Slander and Defamation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
COVID-19 Policies	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Leave to Appeal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of director's duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Frustration of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
COVID-19 Measures	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Prosecutorial Discretion	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Material non-disclosure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Limitation of Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Voyage charterparties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insurance Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rectification of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Pure Economic Loss	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Chattel Mortgage	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
In Rem Action	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Dangerous Goods	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty to Warn	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Title to Sue	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Irregularity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
In Personam	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
In Rem	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Interference	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Detention of Cargo	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shipowner's right of lien	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Ownership of cargo	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Lien clause	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Arrest of Vessel	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Collections	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Communications and Media	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Consumer Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Defamation Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Health Care	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Internet Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Regulatory Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shipping	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Warranty Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Amendment of Pleadings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Frustration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Tenancy Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Default Judgement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Further and better particulars	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Approbation and Reprobation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Authority of Agent	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wrongful arrest	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Prospect of Success	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Misappropriation of Funds	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Collateral Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Discontinuance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Online Falsehoods	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Documentary evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Loan Agreements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Marine Insurance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory derivative action	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Equal protection of the law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Public Health Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Tean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lim Tean has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 26 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Carson Law Chambers	26 cases	68% of cases	Chia Kok Kee v Tan Wah: Appeal on Statutory Demand in Bankruptcy Proceedings(Dec 2024) Chia Kok Kee v Tan Wah: Dispute over Co-Investment and Statutory Demand in Bankruptcy Proceedings(Aug 2024) Tang Swea Phing v Chan Tam Hoi: Defamation, Agency, and Debt Recovery(Jun 2024)
Rajah and Tann	7 cases	18% of cases	Marina Offshore v China Insurance: Marine Insurance, Perils of the Sea & Unseaworthiness(Dec 2005) Treasure Valley Group Ltd v Saputra Teddy: Admiralty Jurisdiction, Vessel Arrest & Approbation/Reprobation(Nov 2005) Hub Warrior v QBE Insurance: Negligence, Marine Insurance & Rectification(Dec 2004)
Rajah & Tann	5 cases	13% of cases	Marina Offshore v China Insurance: Marine Insurance Coverage for Tugboat Loss at Sea(Sep 2006) The Melati: Discontinuance of Action Due to Late Service of Statement of Claim(Oct 2003) Trans-World v Cornelder: Misrepresentation, Title to Goods & Storage(Mar 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Tean's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.2
Complex Cases: 6 (16%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	3%
Lost	273.5 parties avg	3.5	71%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	3%
Partial	22.5 parties avg	2.5	5%
Won	72.4 parties avg	2.4	18%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2003	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	23.3 parties avg	3.3
2006	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2022	94.4 parties avg	4.4
2023	62.8 parties avg	2.8
2024	62.5 parties avg	2.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Tean's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(3%)	3%
Lost	27(71%)	71%
Neutral	1(3%)	3%
Partial	2(5%)	5%
Won	7(18%)	18%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,043,500.00	43,479.1724 cases	24

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2003	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2004	4 22	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2005	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2021	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2022	9 72	Lost: 7 cases (77.8%) Won: 2 cases (22.2%)
2023	6 51	Lost: 5 cases (83.3%) Won: 1 cases (16.7%)
2024	6 141	Dismissed: 1 cases (16.7%) Lost: 4 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (16.7%)

Case History

Displaying all 38 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Chia Kok Kee v Tan Wah: Appeal on Statutory Demand in Bankruptcy Proceedings 01 Dec 2024 Chia Kok Kee (Appellant)Lost	01 Dec 2024	Chia Kok Kee (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; ordered to pay indemnity costs of $20,000 to the respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Chia Kok Kee v Tan Wah: Dispute over Co-Investment and Statutory Demand in Bankruptcy Proceedings 19 Aug 2024 Chia Kok Kee (Claimant, Appellant)Lost	19 Aug 2024	Chia Kok Kee (Claimant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; ordered to pay costs fixed at $10,500 all in. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Tang Swea Phing v Chan Tam Hoi: Defamation, Agency, and Debt Recovery 28 Jun 2024 Tang Swea Phing (Appellant, Respondent in Counterclaim, Defendant)Partial	28 Jun 2024	Tang Swea Phing (Appellant, Respondent in Counterclaim, Defendant): Appeal allowed in part and dismissed in partAppeal allowed in part and dismissed in part. The court upheld the finding of liability for defamation and the dismissal of Ms. Tang's counterclaim but substituted the damages award of $10,000 with nominal damages of $1. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
4	Jiangsu New Huaming v PT Musim Mas: Breach of Contract & Agency Dispute 19 Mar 2024 Jiangsu New Huaming International Trading Co Ltd (Plaintiff)Dismissed	19 Mar 2024	Jiangsu New Huaming International Trading Co Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for breach of contract was dismissed.
5	Kottakki Srinivas Patnaik v Attorney-General: Prosecutorial Discretion & Right to Equality 29 Feb 2024 Kottakki Srinivas Patnaik (Appellant)Lost	29 Feb 2024	Kottakki Srinivas Patnaik (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs fixed at $20,000, inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Biswas v Mukherjee: Extension of Time to Appeal Bankruptcy Order 30 Jan 2024 Pradeepto Kumar Biswas (Applicant)Lost	30 Jan 2024	Pradeepto Kumar Biswas (Applicant): Application DismissedEOT Application dismissed with costs to the Respondents on an indemnity basis fixed at $12,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Mukherjee v Biswas: Bankruptcy Proceedings & Duty to Obtain Sanction of Official Assignee 14 Sep 2023 Pradeepto Kumar Biswas (Defendant, Appellant, Claimant)Lost	14 Sep 2023	Pradeepto Kumar Biswas (Defendant, Appellant, Claimant): Appeals and applications dismissedSUM 2247, SUM 268, RA 343, RA 344, and RA 348 dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Maybank Singapore Ltd v Synergy Global Resources Pte Ltd: Winding Up Application & Contractual Discretion 11 Sep 2023 Synergy Global Resources Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	11 Sep 2023	Synergy Global Resources Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application DismissedSUM 1741 is dismissed.
9	Xu Yuan Chen v Attorney-General: POFMA Appeal on Falsehoods in Facebook Post 25 Jul 2023 Xu Yuan Chen @ Terry Xu (Appellant)Lost	25 Jul 2023	Xu Yuan Chen @ Terry Xu (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against the Correction Direction was dismissed.
10	Kottakki Srinivas Patnaik v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Prosecutorial Discretion & Constitutional Rights 20 Jun 2023 Kottakki Srinivas Patnaik (Applicant)Lost	20 Jun 2023	Kottakki Srinivas Patnaik (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for judicial review was dismissed; costs awarded to the Attorney-General.
11	Attorney-General v Xu Yuan Chen: Contempt of Court, Publishing Scandalous Material 05 Apr 2023 Xu Yuan Chen @ Terry Xu (Respondent)Lost	05 Apr 2023	Xu Yuan Chen @ Terry Xu (Respondent): Contempt of CourtFound liable for contempt of court and fined S$18,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
12	Jiangsu New Huaming v PT Musim Mas: Amendment of Pleadings Dispute 05 Feb 2023 Jiangsu New Huaming International Trading Co Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	05 Feb 2023	Jiangsu New Huaming International Trading Co Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; costs here and below reserved to the trial judge.
13	Loy Wei Ezekiel v Yip Holdings: Appeal on Setting Aside Default Judgment for Breach of Fiduciary Duty 05 Dec 2022 Loy Wei Ezekiel (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	05 Dec 2022	Loy Wei Ezekiel (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; ordered to pay costs of $24,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
14	Xingang Investment v Tengah Engineering: Summary Judgment & Striking Out Counterclaim 07 Nov 2022 Ng Boon Chwee (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	07 Nov 2022	Ng Boon Chwee (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against summary judgment and striking out of counterclaim dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	Chua Qwong Meng v SBS Transit Ltd: Employment Law - Breach of Contract and Employment Act Claims 25 Aug 2022 Chua Qwong Meng (Plaintiff)Lost	25 Aug 2022	Chua Qwong Meng (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedAll claims dismissed.
16	Xu Yuan Chen v Attorney-General: Constitutional Right to Equality and Prosecutorial Discretion 24 Aug 2022 Xu Yuan Chen (alias Terry Xu) (Appellant)Lost	24 Aug 2022	Xu Yuan Chen (alias Terry Xu) (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Xu Yuan Chen to pay the Attorney-General the costs of the appeal fixed at $15,000 (inclusive of disbursements). Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	Han Hui Hui v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of COVID-19 Policies & Vaccination 15 Jun 2022 Muhammad Faizal bin Mustafa (Applicant)Lost	15 Jun 2022	Muhammad Faizal bin Mustafa (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication for judicial review dismissed.
18	Biswas v Mukherjee: Retrial Application Dismissed for Lack of Jurisdiction & Abuse of Process 10 Apr 2022 Pradeepto Kumar Biswas (Applicant)Lost	10 Apr 2022	Pradeepto Kumar Biswas (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for a new trial was dismissed due to lack of jurisdiction, absence of merit, and abuse of process. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
19	Mytsyk v Med Travel: Statutory Derivative Action & Director's Duties 30 Mar 2022 Mytsyk, Viktoriia (Applicant)Lost	30 Mar 2022	Mytsyk, Viktoriia (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication for leave to bring a statutory derivative action was dismissed.
20	Lachman's Emporium Pte Ltd v Kang Tien Kuan: Application for Leave to Appeal on Frustration of Tenancy Agreement due to COVID-19 Measures 23 Mar 2022 Kang Tien Kuan (Respondent, Defendant)Won	23 Mar 2022	Kang Tien Kuan (Respondent, Defendant): Leave application dismissedThe leave application against Kang Tien Kuan was dismissed, and Lachman's Emporium Pte Ltd was ordered to pay costs of $4,000 to Kang Tien Kuan (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
21	Lachman’s Emporium v Kang Tien Kuan: Frustration of Tenancy Agreement Due to COVID-19 Restrictions 25 Jan 2022 Kang Tien Kuan (Defendant)Won	25 Jan 2022	Kang Tien Kuan (Defendant): Summary Judgment Application DismissedThe defendant successfully argued that there was a triable issue of frustration of contract, leading to the dismissal of the plaintiff's application for summary judgment.
22	Xu Yuan Chen v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Prosecutorial Discretion & Equal Protection 29 Dec 2021 Xu Yuan Chen (alias Terry Xu) (Applicant)Lost	29 Dec 2021	Xu Yuan Chen (alias Terry Xu) (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for leave to commence judicial review was dismissed; costs of $5,000 awarded to the Attorney-General (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
23	The Online Citizen Pte Ltd v IMDA: Judicial Review of Broadcasting License Suspension 15 Dec 2021 The Online Citizen Pte Ltd (Applicant)Lost	15 Dec 2021	The Online Citizen Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application dismissedTOCPL's application for leave to apply for quashing orders and declarations was dismissed.
24	Lee Hsien Loong v Xu Yuan Chen: Defamation, Damages, and Justification in Online Publication 31 Aug 2021 Xu Yuan Chen (Defendant)Lost	31 Aug 2021	Xu Yuan Chen (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantDamages assessed at $210,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
25	Leong Sze Hian v Lee Hsien Loong: Appeal Against Striking Out Counterclaim for Abuse of Process 26 Sep 2019 Leong Sze Hian (Appellant)Lost	26 Sep 2019	Leong Sze Hian (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against striking out counterclaim dismissed; appellant to pay respondent costs fixed at $20,000, inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
26	Lee Hsien Loong v Leong Sze Hian: Defamation Claim over 1MDB Article Sharing 11 Mar 2019 Leong Sze Hian (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim)Lost	11 Mar 2019	Leong Sze Hian (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim): Counterclaim struck outThe court struck out the defendant's counterclaim based on the tort of abuse of process.
27	Marina Offshore v China Insurance: Marine Insurance Coverage for Tugboat Loss at Sea 10 Sep 2006 AXA Insurance Singapore Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	10 Sep 2006	AXA Insurance Singapore Pte Ltd (Respondent): Judgment againstJudgment against AXA Insurance in the sum of $280,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
28	Marina Offshore v China Insurance: Marine Insurance, Perils of the Sea & Unseaworthiness 29 Dec 2005 AXA Insurance Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	29 Dec 2005	AXA Insurance Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
29	Treasure Valley Group Ltd v Saputra Teddy: Admiralty Jurisdiction, Vessel Arrest & Approbation/Reprobation 20 Nov 2005 Treasure Valley Group Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	20 Nov 2005	Treasure Valley Group Ltd (Plaintiff): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs in the cause (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
30	Hub Warrior v QBE Insurance: Negligence, Marine Insurance & Rectification 27 Dec 2004 QBE Insurance (Malaysia) Bhd (Defendant)Won	27 Dec 2004	QBE Insurance (Malaysia) Bhd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant; plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs.
31	Sunrise Crane: Duty of Care & Limitation of Liability in Dangerous Goods Transfer 12 Sep 2004 Doman Shipping SA (Appellant)Lost	12 Sep 2004	Doman Shipping SA (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed on both liability and quantum.
32	Melati: Discontinuance Without Leave & Extension of Time for Statement of Claim 27 Jun 2004 Cargo owners (Plaintiff, Respondent)Lost	27 Jun 2004	Cargo owners (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
33	The "Melati" (No 2): Appeal on Extension of Time to File Statement of Claim 14 Apr 2004 The "Melati" (No 2) (Appellant)Won	14 Apr 2004	The "Melati" (No 2) (Appellant): Appeal was properly broughtThe court held that the appeal was properly brought because the orders of Ang J were interlocutory orders and the shipowners complied with s 34(1)(c) of the SCJA.
34	The Melati: Discontinuance of Action Due to Late Service of Statement of Claim 20 Oct 2003 Defendants (Respondent)Lost	20 Oct 2003	Defendants (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the court extended the time for service of the Statement of Claim.
35	Trans-World v Cornelder: Misrepresentation, Title to Goods & Storage 16 Mar 2003 Cornelder China (Singapore) (Defendant)Neutral	16 Mar 2003	Cornelder China (Singapore) (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedDefendants’ Counterclaim is dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
36	Glencore International AG v The Cherry: Delivery of Cargo Without Bill of Lading & Agency in Oil Trade Dispute 11 Nov 2002 Owners of the vessels Cherry, Epic and Addax (Appellant)Partial	11 Nov 2002	Owners of the vessels Cherry, Epic and Addax (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal of the owners of the Cherry in respect of the Hyperion cargo is allowed and they are awarded the costs of this portion of the appeal and of this portion of the action below (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
37	Glencore International AG v Stanley Shipping Ltd: Bills of Lading, Cargo Loss, and Conversion 04 Apr 2002 Wyndham Shipping Ltd (Defendant)Lost	04 Apr 2002	Wyndham Shipping Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed against the defendant. Currency assumed to be SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction.
38	Epic: Wrongful Detention of Cargo & Shipowner's Lien Dispute 26 Jun 2000 Petromar Energy Resources Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	26 Jun 2000	Petromar Energy Resources Pte Ltd (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentJudgment for the respondent with damages to be assessed by the registrar. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.