Lim Tiong Garn Jason

Lim Tiong Garn Jason is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in wrongful dismissal and termination. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lim Tiong Garn Jason has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and summary judgement.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	14% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Lim Tiong Garn Jason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Tiong Garn Jason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Lim Tiong Garn Jason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Dismissal	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Tiong Garn Jason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Lim Tiong Garn Jason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Tiong Garn Jason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Tiong Garn Jason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Tiong Garn Jason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Tiong Garn Jason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Without Prejudice Privilege	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Tiong Garn Jason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lim Tiong Garn Jason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Client confidentiality	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Tiong Garn Jason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Tiong Garn Jason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Tiong Garn Jason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Tiong Garn Jason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Tiong Garn Jason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lim Tiong Garn Jason has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	3 cases	100% of cases	Sameer Rahman v Nomura Singapore Limited: Striking Out Pleadings in Wrongful Dismissal & Negligent Misinformation Claim(Feb 2021) Sameer Rahman v. Nomura Singapore Ltd: Striking Out Pleadings in Wrongful Dismissal & Employment Law(Aug 2020) Swee Wan Enterprises v Yak Thye Peng: Admissibility of 'Without Prejudice' Communications(Dec 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Tiong Garn Jason's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Tiong Garn Jason's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Partial	1(33%)	33%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Sameer Rahman v Nomura Singapore Limited: Striking Out Pleadings in Wrongful Dismissal & Negligent Misinformation Claim 21 Feb 2021 Nomura Singapore Limited (Respondent, Defendant)Partial	21 Feb 2021	Nomura Singapore Limited (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal dismissed in part regarding the negligent misinformation claim.
2	Sameer Rahman v. Nomura Singapore Ltd: Striking Out Pleadings in Wrongful Dismissal & Employment Law 23 Aug 2020 Nomura Singapore Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	23 Aug 2020	Nomura Singapore Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal allowed in large partThe court struck out claims for loss of job opportunities, breach of trust, duty of care, and libel.
3	Swee Wan Enterprises v Yak Thye Peng: Admissibility of 'Without Prejudice' Communications 07 Dec 2017 Swee Wan Enterprises Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	07 Dec 2017	Swee Wan Enterprises Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedThe plaintiff's appeal was dismissed, and the defendant's appeal against the Assistant Registrar's decision was allowed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.