Lim Tse Haw

Lim Tse Haw is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2005. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and securities fraud.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lim Tse Haw has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Lim Tse Haw has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lim Tse Haw has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Tse Haw has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Securities Fraud	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Tse Haw has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Weapons Charges	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Tse Haw has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Tse Haw has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Tse Haw has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Tse Haw has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Tse Haw has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Tse Haw has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Tse Haw has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Tse Haw has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Voluntariness	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Tse Haw has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Tse Haw has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Retracted confessions	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Tse Haw has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lim Tse Haw has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Harry Elias Partnership	3 cases	100% of cases	PP v Lim Thian Lai: Arms Offences Act - Using Arm, Admissibility of Statements(Jul 2005) Teo Kian Leong v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence for Securities Industry Act Violations(Mar 2002) Teo Kian Leong v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Law, Statutory Interpretation(Dec 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Tse Haw's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Tse Haw's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Lim Thian Lai: Arms Offences Act - Using Arm, Admissibility of Statements 12 Jul 2005 Lim Thian Lai (Defense)Lost	12 Jul 2005	Lim Thian Lai (Defense): Accused convictedAccused convicted and sentenced to capital punishment.
2	Teo Kian Leong v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence for Securities Industry Act Violations 03 Mar 2002 Teo Kian Leong (Appellant)Lost	03 Mar 2002	Teo Kian Leong (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the trial judge’s decision to order a subsequent term of imprisonment to commence after the expiration of the appellant’s existing term was dismissed.
3	Teo Kian Leong v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Law, Statutory Interpretation 06 Dec 2001 Teo Kian Leong (Appellant)Lost	06 Dec 2001	Teo Kian Leong (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.