Lim Wei Liang Jason

Lim Wei Liang Jason is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in corruption, drug trafficking and other serious crimes (confiscation of benefits) act and criminal procedure. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lim Wei Liang Jason has demonstrated expertise across 37 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and corruption, drug trafficking and other serious crimes (confiscation of benefits) act.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lim Wei Liang Jason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Lim Wei Liang Jason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Lim Wei Liang Jason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Wei Liang Jason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Wei Liang Jason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Wei Liang Jason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Wei Liang Jason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Wei Liang Jason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lim Wei Liang Jason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Wei Liang Jason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Lim Wei Liang Jason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Wei Liang Jason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Wei Liang Jason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Wei Liang Jason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Indemnity costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Wei Liang Jason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Wei Liang Jason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Wei Liang Jason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Wei Liang Jason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Wei Liang Jason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty of disclosure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Wei Liang Jason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Wei Liang Jason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Wei Liang Jason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Wei Liang Jason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Confiscation and forfeiture	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Wei Liang Jason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Professional Privilege	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Wei Liang Jason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Wei Liang Jason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation Privilege	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Wei Liang Jason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy Chapter 11	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Wei Liang Jason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Wei Liang Jason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Wei Liang Jason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Wei Liang Jason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Wei Liang Jason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Wei Liang Jason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Wei Liang Jason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Wei Liang Jason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Wei Liang Jason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lim Wei Liang Jason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lim Wei Liang Jason has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
K&L Gates Straits Law LLC	3 cases	60% of cases	The Enterprise Fund III Ltd v CNPLaw LLP: Negligence Claim Against Lawyers for Flawed Loan Facility Agreement(Dec 2023) Lim Oon Kuin v Ocean Tankers: Breach of Fiduciary Duties and Summary Judgment(Oct 2021) Public Prosecutor v Soh Chee Wen: Litigation Privilege in Criminal Proceedings(Sep 2019)
Straits Law Practice LLC	2 cases	40% of cases	Rajendar Prasad Rai v Public Prosecutor: Stay of Orders Pending Restraint Order Application Under CDSA(Jul 2017) PP v. Rajendar Prasad Rai: CDSA Application for Restraint & Charging Orders over Suspected Criminal Proceeds(May 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Wei Liang Jason's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.2
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	20%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	20%
Unknown	13.0 parties avg	3.0	20%
Won	23.5 parties avg	3.5	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Wei Liang Jason's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20%)	20%
Neutral	1(20%)	20%
Unknown	1(20%)	20%
Won	2(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	42,000.00	42,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Unknown: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	The Enterprise Fund III Ltd v CNPLaw LLP: Negligence Claim Against Lawyers for Flawed Loan Facility Agreement 06 Dec 2023 CNPLaw LLP (formerly known as Colin Ng & Partnership) (Defendant)Won	06 Dec 2023	CNPLaw LLP (formerly known as Colin Ng & Partnership) (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe Lenders’ claim against CNP was dismissed.
2	Lim Oon Kuin v Ocean Tankers: Breach of Fiduciary Duties and Summary Judgment 27 Oct 2021 Ocean Tankers (Pte) Ltd (Interim Judicial Managers Appointed) (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	27 Oct 2021	Ocean Tankers (Pte) Ltd (Interim Judicial Managers Appointed) (Respondent, Plaintiff): Summary Judgment UpheldSummary judgment in favor of Ocean Tankers upheld; awarded indemnity costs of $42,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Public Prosecutor v Soh Chee Wen: Litigation Privilege in Criminal Proceedings 29 Sep 2019 Soh Chee Wen (Defense)Neutral	29 Sep 2019	Soh Chee Wen (Defense): Ruling ClarifiedThe court clarified the scope of litigation privilege for the prosecution and the approach to cross-examination.
4	Rajendar Prasad Rai v Public Prosecutor: Stay of Orders Pending Restraint Order Application Under CDSA 30 Jul 2017 Gurchandni Kaur Charan Singh (Applicant)	30 Jul 2017	Gurchandni Kaur Charan Singh (Applicant): -
5	PP v. Rajendar Prasad Rai: CDSA Application for Restraint & Charging Orders over Suspected Criminal Proceeds 31 May 2017 Rajendar Prasad Rai (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	31 May 2017	Rajendar Prasad Rai (Defendant, Respondent): Orders Granted AgainstOrders granted for restraint of specific bank accounts and charging orders on properties.