Lim Wei Shin

Lim Wei Shin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in winding up and family arrangement. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lim Wei Shin has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in trust law and property law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Trust Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Lim Wei Shin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Lim Wei Shin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lim Wei Shin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	2 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Lim Wei Shin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Wei Shin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Wei Shin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Wei Shin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Management Deadlock	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Wei Shin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Quasi-partnerships	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Wei Shin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Family Arrangement	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Wei Shin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholders Rights	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Wei Shin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Wei Shin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Family Companies	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Wei Shin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Wei Shin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Wei Shin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Wei Shin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lim Wei Shin has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	2 cases	67% of cases	Teo Cha Sau v Ong Lay Loon: Family Arrangement, Loan Repayment & Beneficial Ownership Dispute(Sep 2010) Chow Kwok Chuen v Chow Kwok Chi: Winding Up of Family Companies on Just and Equitable Grounds(Aug 2008)
Attorney-General’s Chambers	1 cases	33% of cases	Koh Lau Keow v Attorney-General: Validity of Buddhist Temple Trust(Mar 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Wei Shin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.1
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	17.0 parties avg	7.0	33%
Lost	22.5 parties avg	2.5	67%
Won	26.0 parties avg	6.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2010	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Wei Shin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(20%)	20%
Lost	2(40%)	40%
Won	2(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2010	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Koh Lau Keow v Attorney-General: Validity of Buddhist Temple Trust 16 Mar 2014 Attorney-General (Respondent)Lost	16 Mar 2014	Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was allowed and the trust was declared void.
2	Teo Cha Sau v Ong Lay Loon: Family Arrangement, Loan Repayment & Beneficial Ownership Dispute 15 Sep 2010 Ong Lay Ann (Defendant)Won	15 Sep 2010	Ong Lay Ann (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantClaims against Ong Lay Ann dismissed.
3	Chow Kwok Chuen v Chow Kwok Chi: Winding Up of Family Companies on Just and Equitable Grounds 12 Aug 2008 Chow Cho Poon (Pte) Ltd (Respondent)Lost	12 Aug 2008	Chow Cho Poon (Pte) Ltd (Respondent): Winding-up Order AffirmedThe court affirmed the winding-up order of the Companies (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).