Lim Wei Wen Gordon

Lim Wei Wen Gordon is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in land law and eminent domain. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lim Wei Wen Gordon has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and land law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	3 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Lim Wei Wen Gordon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Land Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Lim Wei Wen Gordon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Wei Wen Gordon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Wei Wen Gordon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Eminent Domain	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Wei Wen Gordon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Land Acquisition	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Wei Wen Gordon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Professional Liability	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Wei Wen Gordon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Wei Wen Gordon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Wei Wen Gordon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Director's Disqualification	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Wei Wen Gordon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Adducing fresh evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Wei Wen Gordon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Professional Engineering Conduct	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Wei Wen Gordon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Compulsory Acquisition	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Wei Wen Gordon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Wei Wen Gordon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Valuation of Property	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Wei Wen Gordon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Immigration Offences	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lim Wei Wen Gordon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Wei Wen Gordon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Wei Wen Gordon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Wei Wen Gordon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lim Wei Wen Gordon has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	3 cases	75% of cases	Kardachi v Attorney-General: Director Disqualification under Section 155A Companies Act(Sep 2020) YCH Distripark Pte Ltd v Collector of Land Revenue: Compulsory Land Acquisition & Compensation(Jul 2020) YCH Distripark Pte Ltd v Collector of Land Revenue: Interpretation of Land Acquisition Act s 29(2)(Oct 2019)
TSMP Law Corporation	1 cases	25% of cases	Fong Chee Keong v Professional Engineers Board: Appeal Against Disciplinary Action for Immigration Act Offence(Apr 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Wei Wen Gordon's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Wei Wen Gordon's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	29,000.00	9,666.673 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Kardachi v Attorney-General: Director Disqualification under Section 155A Companies Act 21 Sep 2020 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	21 Sep 2020	Attorney-General (Respondent): WonAppeal dismissed; awarded costs of $20,000 inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	YCH Distripark Pte Ltd v Collector of Land Revenue: Compulsory Land Acquisition & Compensation 13 Jul 2020 The Collector of Land Revenue (Respondent)Won	13 Jul 2020	The Collector of Land Revenue (Respondent): Appeal UpheldThe Collector's decision was upheld as the court dismissed the appeal.
3	YCH Distripark Pte Ltd v Collector of Land Revenue: Interpretation of Land Acquisition Act s 29(2) 30 Oct 2019 The Collector of Land Revenue (Respondent)Lost	30 Oct 2019	The Collector of Land Revenue (Respondent): Application grantedThe Collector's application to strike out YCH's notice of appeal was dismissed.
4	Fong Chee Keong v Professional Engineers Board: Appeal Against Disciplinary Action for Immigration Act Offence 04 Apr 2016 Professional Engineers Board, Singapore (Respondent)Partial	04 Apr 2016	Professional Engineers Board, Singapore (Respondent): Finding of guilt upheldFinding of guilt under s 31G(1)(a) of the Professional Engineers Act upheld. Costs of the appeal fixed at $9,000 plus reasonable disbursements to be paid by the appellant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).