Lim Yanqing Esther Candice

Lim Yanqing Esther Candice is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2022 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil procedure and fraud and deceit. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lim Yanqing Esther Candice has demonstrated expertise across 24 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and summary judgement.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Lim Yanqing Esther Candice has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Lim Yanqing Esther Candice has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Yanqing Esther Candice has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Yanqing Esther Candice has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Loan Agreement	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Lim Yanqing Esther Candice has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Yanqing Esther Candice has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Yanqing Esther Candice has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Yanqing Esther Candice has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Yanqing Esther Candice has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Yanqing Esther Candice has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Yanqing Esther Candice has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Yanqing Esther Candice has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Yanqing Esther Candice has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Yanqing Esther Candice has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Yanqing Esther Candice has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Yanqing Esther Candice has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Amendments	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Yanqing Esther Candice has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Inconsistent positions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Yanqing Esther Candice has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Yanqing Esther Candice has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Principle of approbation and reprobation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Yanqing Esther Candice has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Yanqing Esther Candice has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Yanqing Esther Candice has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Yanqing Esther Candice has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Yanqing Esther Candice has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lim Yanqing Esther Candice has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Braddell Brothers LLP	4 cases	100% of cases	Lee Wee Ching v Wang Piao: Appealability of Summary Judgment Under Rules of Court 2021(Mar 2024) Wang Piao v Lee Wee Ching: Summary Judgment Appeal for US$1.95M Loan Dispute(Oct 2023) Wang Piao v Lee Wee Ching: Amendment of Defence Post-Summary Judgment(Aug 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Yanqing Esther Candice's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.5 parties avg	2.5	50%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Yanqing Esther Candice's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	13,000.00	13,000.001 cases	1
USD	1,950,000.00	1,950,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lee Wee Ching v Wang Piao: Appealability of Summary Judgment Under Rules of Court 2021 24 Mar 2024 Wang Piao (Respondent)Lost	24 Mar 2024	Wang Piao (Respondent): Application to Strike Out AppealApplication to strike out the appeal was dismissed, and Mr. Wang was ordered to pay Mr. Lee the costs of the application fixed at $13,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Wang Piao v Lee Wee Ching: Summary Judgment Appeal for US$1.95M Loan Dispute 02 Oct 2023 Wang Piao (Claimant, Respondent)Won	02 Oct 2023	Wang Piao (Claimant, Respondent): Judgment for ClaimantSummary judgment granted for the claimant in the sum of US$1.95m, together with interest thereon.
3	Wang Piao v Lee Wee Ching: Amendment of Defence Post-Summary Judgment 03 Aug 2023 Wang Piao (Claimant)Won	03 Aug 2023	Wang Piao (Claimant): Application dismissedThe defendant's application to amend his defence was dismissed.
4	CLX v CLY: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Fraud & Abuse of Process 24 Jan 2022 CLX (Plaintiff, Defendant)Lost	24 Jan 2022	CLX (Plaintiff, Defendant): Application DismissedCLX's application to set aside the arbitration award was dismissed.