Lim Yao Jun

Lim Yao Jun is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in striking out and shipping law. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lim Yao Jun has demonstrated expertise across 31 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Lim Yao Jun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Yao Jun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lim Yao Jun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lim Yao Jun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Yao Jun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Yao Jun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Yao Jun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Yao Jun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Yao Jun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Yao Jun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Yao Jun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Yao Jun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Yao Jun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Yao Jun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Yao Jun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Yao Jun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Yao Jun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Yao Jun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Yao Jun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lim Yao Jun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Yao Jun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Yao Jun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Yao Jun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Equity of Redemption	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Yao Jun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Yao Jun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Occupiers' Liability	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Yao Jun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Yao Jun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Court Order	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Yao Jun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Yao Jun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Yao Jun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Yao Jun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lim Yao Jun has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	2 cases	50% of cases	Singapore Shooting Association v. Singapore Rifle Association: Negligence and Occupier's Liability in Flooding Incident(Oct 2017) Tan Swee Wan v Lian Tian Yong Johnny: Striking Out Pleadings in Fraudulent Misrepresentation Claim(Sep 2016)
Kelvin Chia Partnership	2 cases	50% of cases	Ramindo Sukses Perkasa v Sim Kwang Oo: Striking Out for Contempt of Court Orders(Mar 2015) Qingjian v Capstone: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination Under SOPA for Payment Claim Dispute(Feb 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Yao Jun's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.7 parties avg	2.7	50%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Yao Jun's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	20,000.00	5,000.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Singapore Shooting Association v. Singapore Rifle Association: Negligence and Occupier's Liability in Flooding Incident 29 Oct 2017 Singapore Rifle Association (Defendant, Appellant)Partial	29 Oct 2017	Singapore Rifle Association (Defendant, Appellant): Counterclaim dismissed in partThe SRA’s claim in respect of the 1st Flood is dismissed.
2	Tan Swee Wan v Lian Tian Yong Johnny: Striking Out Pleadings in Fraudulent Misrepresentation Claim 27 Sep 2016 Kelvin Low Keng Siang (Plaintiff, Respondent)Lost	27 Sep 2016	Kelvin Low Keng Siang (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed in favor of the Defendant; Paragraph 26(d) of the SOC was struck out. Costs of S$5,000 (excluding reasonable disbursements) to be paid by the Plaintiffs to the Defendant. Costs of S$2,400 ordered by the AR for the hearing below and previously paid by the Defendant to the Plaintiffs was to be returned to the Defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Ramindo Sukses Perkasa v Sim Kwang Oo: Striking Out for Contempt of Court Orders 24 Mar 2015 Sim Kwang Oo (Defendant, Respondent)Won	24 Mar 2015	Sim Kwang Oo (Defendant, Respondent): Application AllowedApplication to strike out OS 463 was allowed; costs of SGD 20,000 awarded to the Defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Qingjian v Capstone: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination Under SOPA for Payment Claim Dispute 17 Feb 2014 Qingjian International (South Pacific) Group Development Co Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	17 Feb 2014	Qingjian International (South Pacific) Group Development Co Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application dismissedThe plaintiff's application to set aside the adjudication determination was dismissed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.