Lim Ying Sin Daniel

Lim Ying Sin Daniel is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 10 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in intellectual property law and patents. Their track record shows a 27.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated expertise across 52 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and intellectual property law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	4 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Patents	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice13% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Groundless threat	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Patent Infringement	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of court proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commodity Trading	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rights Management Information	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Parallel Imports	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Case management stay of proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Validity of settlement agreement containing arbitration clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Societies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Patent Construction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Novelty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Validity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inventive step	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Defects	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dispute Resolution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unfair Competition	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Ying Sin Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lim Ying Sin Daniel has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Joyce A. Tan & Partners LLC	8 cases	80% of cases	TOWA Corp v ASMPT: Patent Infringement Damages Assessment Appeal(Nov 2024) TOWA Corp v ASMPT: Patent Infringement Damages Assessment Clarification(Jun 2024) Towa Corp v ASM Technology: Patent Infringement & Damages Assessment(Apr 2023)
Joyce A Tan & Partners	2 cases	20% of cases	ASM Technology v Towa Corporation: Patent Infringement & Modularity(Jan 2018) Diamond Exchange of Singapore v Singapore Diamond Exchange: Security for Costs under Societies Act(Apr 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Ying Sin Daniel's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.1
Complex Cases: 2 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	63.1 parties avg	3.1	60%
Partial	22.5 parties avg	2.5	20%
Won	33.4 parties avg	3.4	30%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2021	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2023	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2024	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Ying Sin Daniel's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(55%)	55%
Partial	2(18%)	18%
Won	3(27%)	27%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
JPY	773,884,792.00	773,884,792.001 cases	1
SGD	185,000.00	46,250.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2024	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 10 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	TOWA Corp v ASMPT: Patent Infringement Damages Assessment Appeal 21 Nov 2024 ASMPT Singapore Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant, Appellant)Partial	21 Nov 2024	ASMPT Singapore Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partASMPT's appeal was allowed in part regarding the failure to account for certain costs under the category of “general additional costs of sales”. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	TOWA Corp v ASMPT: Patent Infringement Damages Assessment Clarification 26 Jun 2024 ASMPT Limited (Defendant)Lost	26 Jun 2024	ASMPT Limited (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantDamages awarded against the defendant in the sum of ¥386,942,396, excluding interests and costs. Assumed JPY as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Towa Corp v ASM Technology: Patent Infringement & Damages Assessment 13 Apr 2023 ASM Pacific Technology Limited (Defendant)Lost	13 Apr 2023	ASM Pacific Technology Limited (Defendant): Liable for damagesFound liable for damages to Towa Corporation for patent infringement. The currency is JPY, as it is the functional currency of Towa Corporation.
4	Tsudakoma Corp v Global Trade Well Pte Ltd: Stay of Proceedings and Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause 02 Feb 2023 Tsudakoma Corp (Claimant, Respondent)Lost	02 Feb 2023	Tsudakoma Corp (Claimant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal by Global Trade Well Pte Ltd was allowed, and a stay of the Singapore proceedings was granted.
5	FUJIFILM v PTC Business Systems: Trade Mark, Copyright, Passing Off 29 Nov 2021 FUJIFILM Business Innovation Corp (Plaintiff)Won	29 Nov 2021	FUJIFILM Business Innovation Corp (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffInjunction, delivery up and forfeiture or destruction; and the order for an inquiry as to damages, or at the plaintiffs’ election in the alternative, an account of profits, or statutory damages in lieu of damages, in respect of the infringement of the copyright in the 3rd plaintiff’s computer software/firmware in the relevant Fuji Xerox Equipment and the infringement of the 3rd plaintiff’s rights in the rights management information in such computer software/firmware. Additional damages in the sum of $100,000. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	PUBG Corp v Garena: Stay of Court Proceedings Pending Arbitration on Settlement Agreement Validity 18 May 2020 PUBG Corporation (Appellant)Lost	18 May 2020	PUBG Corporation (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; PUBG Corporation's request to lift the case management stay was denied.
7	Lee Tat Cheng v Maka GPS Technologies: Patent Infringement & Groundless Threat of Proceedings 05 Apr 2018 Lee Tat Cheng (Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	05 Apr 2018	Lee Tat Cheng (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal dismissed regarding patent infringement but allowed regarding the injunction for groundless threats and costs order.
8	ASM Technology v Towa Corporation: Patent Infringement & Modularity 04 Jan 2018 ASM Technology Singapore Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	04 Jan 2018	ASM Technology Singapore Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs of $85,000 (inclusive of disbursements) to be paid by the Appellant to the Respondent. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Towa Corp v ASM Technology: Patent Infringement, Moulding Machine, Inventive Step 21 Dec 2016 ASM Pacific Technology Limited (Defendant)Won	21 Dec 2016	ASM Pacific Technology Limited (Defendant): Claims DismissedThe claim against ASM Pacific Technology Limited was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Diamond Exchange of Singapore v Singapore Diamond Exchange: Security for Costs under Societies Act 02 Apr 2013 Diamond Exchange of Singapore (Plaintiff)Won	02 Apr 2013	Diamond Exchange of Singapore (Plaintiff): Application for security for costs dismissedThe defendant's application for security for costs against the plaintiff was dismissed.