Lim Ying Ying

Lim Ying Ying is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in family law and maintenance. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lim Ying Ying has demonstrated expertise across 27 primary practice areas, with significant experience in family law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Family Law	4 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Lim Ying Ying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lim Ying Ying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Lim Ying Ying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Divorce	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Lim Ying Ying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Assets	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Lim Ying Ying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Lim Ying Ying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Ying Ying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Access to Children	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Ying Ying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Ying Ying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Lim Ying Ying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Child Maintenance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Ying Ying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Ying Ying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Ying Ying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Financial Disclosure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Ying Ying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Promise	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Ying Ying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent Trading	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Ying Ying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Interest in land	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Ying Ying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Proceedings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Ying Ying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Ying Ying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trusts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Ying Ying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Ying Ying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Ying Ying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Ying Ying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Constructive trusts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Ying Ying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Ying Ying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Ying Ying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Ying Ying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lim Ying Ying has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Virginia Quek Lalita & Partners	4 cases	80% of cases	WJZ v WJY: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Maintenance, and Property Dispute(Jan 2024) WAA v VZZ: Appeal on Custody, Access, Maintenance, and Division of Jewellery(Jul 2022) WAA v VZZ: Child Custody and Access Dispute in Divorce Proceedings(Jul 2022)
Yuen Law LLC	1 cases	20% of cases	Marina Towage Pte Ltd v Chin Kwek Chong: Fraudulent Trading & Directors' Liability(Apr 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Ying Ying's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	42.3 parties avg	2.3	80%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Ying Ying's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	4(80%)	80%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	2 2	Partial: 2 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	WJZ v WJY: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Maintenance, and Property Dispute 16 Jan 2024 WJZ (Appellant)Partial	16 Jan 2024	WJZ (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part regarding the division of matrimonial assets. The Disputed Property was included in the pool of matrimonial assets for division. Appeal against orders for maintenance dismissed.
2	WAA v VZZ: Appeal on Custody, Access, Maintenance, and Division of Jewellery 28 Jul 2022 WAA (Appellant)Partial	28 Jul 2022	WAA (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part, to the extent stated in the judgment.
3	WAA v VZZ: Child Custody and Access Dispute in Divorce Proceedings 28 Jul 2022 WAA (Appellant, Defendant)Partial	28 Jul 2022	WAA (Appellant, Defendant): Application in SUM 62 allowed in partFather's application in SUM 62 allowed in part.
4	Renuka v Susan: Dispute over Property Ownership, Constructive & Resulting Trusts 22 Dec 2021 Vishnumangalam Chandrasekharan Renuka (Appellant, Intervener)Partial	22 Dec 2021	Vishnumangalam Chandrasekharan Renuka (Appellant, Intervener): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in respect of the Judge’s decision as to Y’s share in the Property. Appeal dismissed for a decision in respect of her own interest in the Property as that will be addressed in the divorce proceedings.
5	Marina Towage Pte Ltd v Chin Kwek Chong: Fraudulent Trading & Directors' Liability 20 Apr 2021 Chin Chee Chien (Defendant)Won	20 Apr 2021	Chin Chee Chien (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the second defendant.