Lin Chunlong

Lin Chunlong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 19 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and insolvency law. Their track record shows a 32.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 11 complex cases, representing 58% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lin Chunlong has demonstrated expertise across 82 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	10 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 10 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	9 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	7 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	6 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	5 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice24% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice22% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Orders	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joint Accounts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Riddick principle	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Discovery of documents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Laches	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Express trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unincorporated Associations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rape	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Singapore International Arbitration Centre	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Amendment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assignment and attachment of money held by bank	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Professional Privilege	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Declaratory relief	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assignment and attachment of money held in bank	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Domain Name Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Third party proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Tax Evasion	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Allotment Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Correction of commencement date	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Proprietary Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual discretions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Malicious Falsehood	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Guidelines	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lin Chunlong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lin Chunlong has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 13 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	13 cases	68% of cases	Shipworks v Sembcorp Marine: Breach of Contract & Illegality in Shipyard Services(Dec 2024) Kho Choon Keng v Lian Keng Enterprises: Winding Up, Quasi-Partnership, Legitimate Expectations, Mutual Trust(Jul 2024) Third Eye Capital Corp v Pretty View Shipping SA: Riddick Principle & Disclosure(Apr 2024)
Harry Elias Partnership LLP	4 cases	21% of cases	Yap Son On v Ding Pei Zhen: Contractual Interpretation and Share Allotment Dispute(Dec 2016) Tan Boon Hai v Tan Kia Kok: Dispute Over Clan Association Membership and Election Validity(Oct 2016) Tanaka Lumber v Datuk Tufail: Trust, Fiduciary Duty & Conspiracy in Timber Trading Dispute(Oct 2015)
Wong Partnership LLP	1 cases	5% of cases	EQ Capital Investments Ltd v Sunbreeze Group Investments Ltd: Minority Oppression & Third-Party Indemnity(Nov 2017)
Eversheds Harry Elias LLP	1 cases	5% of cases	Public Prosecutor v BDA: Rape, Outrage of Modesty - Son Accused of Sexually Assaulting Mother(Mar 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lin Chunlong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.2
Complex Cases: 11 (58%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	14.0 parties avg	4.0	5%
Lost	74.5 parties avg	4.5	37%
Partial	44.3 parties avg	4.3	21%
Unknown	17.0 parties avg	7.0	5%
Won	63.3 parties avg	3.3	32%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2016	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2017	25.4 parties avg	5.4
2018	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2019	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2020	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2024	34.0 parties avg	4.0
2025	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lin Chunlong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(5%)	5%
Lost	7(37%)	37%
Partial	4(21%)	21%
Unknown	1(5%)	5%
Won	6(32%)	32%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
EUR	2,777,873.70	1,388,936.852 cases	2
SGD	516,134.00	86,022.336 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2016	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2017	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2019	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 11	Unknown: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2024	3 21	Partial: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2025	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 19 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	DMZ v DNA: Permission to Commence Proceedings Against Insolvent Party in Arbitration Dispute 24 Feb 2025 DMZ (Claimant)Lost	24 Feb 2025	DMZ (Claimant): Application DismissedApplication for permission to commence proceedings against the defendant was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Shipworks v Sembcorp Marine: Breach of Contract & Illegality in Shipyard Services 19 Dec 2024 Sembcorp Marine Integrated Yard Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff-in-Counterclaim)Partial	19 Dec 2024	Sembcorp Marine Integrated Yard Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff-in-Counterclaim): Counterclaim Partially AllowedCounterclaim for payments made to the plaintiff partially allowed; quantum to be determined jointly by parties. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Kho Choon Keng v Lian Keng Enterprises: Winding Up, Quasi-Partnership, Legitimate Expectations, Mutual Trust 25 Jul 2024 Kho Choon Keng (Claimant)Partial	25 Jul 2024	Kho Choon Keng (Claimant): Winding up order granted, stayed for 30 days.Winding up order granted, stayed for 30 days to allow parties to reach a compromise. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Third Eye Capital Corp v Pretty View Shipping SA: Riddick Principle & Disclosure 02 Apr 2024 Third Eye Capital Corporation (Claimant)Won	02 Apr 2024	Third Eye Capital Corporation (Claimant): Application allowedThird Eye's application to use the EJD Information in the RMI Application was allowed. The Defendants were ordered to pay costs fixed at S$15,000 in costs, with disbursements to be agreed by the parties. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Kotagaralahalli v Moussa: Trust Deed Dispute & Cost Allocation 30 Mar 2023 Moussa Salem (Defendant)Won	30 Mar 2023	Moussa Salem (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the first defendant, with costs awarded against the plaintiff. The total costs awarded to the first defendant is $366,134 (Section 1 costs of $255,000 and disbursements of $111,134). Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Nagaraja v Salem: Dispute over Beneficial Ownership of Shares in SLI Developments Pte Ltd 05 Jan 2023 Moussa Salem (Defendant)Won	05 Jan 2023	Moussa Salem (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court held that the second defendant holds the shares on resulting trust for the first defendant.
7	Timing Limited v Tay Toh Hin: Garnishee Orders & Joint Accounts Dispute 10 Jan 2021 Timing Limited (Appellant)Lost	10 Jan 2021	Timing Limited (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the decision to not grant a final garnishee order in relation to the two joint accounts was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Rajagopalan v The Wellness Group: Liquidator's Power to Compromise Debts 09 Nov 2020 EQ Capital Investments Ltd (Other)	09 Nov 2020	EQ Capital Investments Ltd (Other): -
9	Timing Ltd v Tay Toh Hin: Garnishee Orders and Joint Bank Accounts 10 Aug 2020 Timing Limited (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	10 Aug 2020	Timing Limited (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed, holding that a show cause order under Order 49 of the Rules of Court can be made against joint accounts where certain criteria are met.
10	EQ Capital Investments Ltd v The Wellness Group Pte Ltd: Winding Up Application for Directors Acting in Own Interests 24 Jun 2019 Sunbreeze Group Investments Ltd (Other)Lost	24 Jun 2019	Sunbreeze Group Investments Ltd (Other): Application dismissedSunbreeze opposed the winding up application, but the application was granted.
11	TWG Tea Co Pte Ltd v Murjani Manoj Mohan: Domain Name Ownership Dispute & Defamation Counterclaim 02 May 2019 Murjani Manoj Mohan (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim)Lost	02 May 2019	Murjani Manoj Mohan (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim): Counterclaims DismissedCounterclaims for unjust enrichment and malicious falsehood are dismissed.
12	Sunbreeze v Sim Chye Hock Ron: Minority Oppression, Third Party Proceedings, Amendment Application 21 Oct 2018 Sunbreeze Group Investments Ltd (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	21 Oct 2018	Sunbreeze Group Investments Ltd (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of $35,000 to be paid to the respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
13	Public Prosecutor v BDA: Rape, Outrage of Modesty - Son Accused of Sexually Assaulting Mother 27 Mar 2018 BDA (Defendant)Lost	27 Mar 2018	BDA (Defendant): ConvictionThe Accused was convicted of rape and outrage of modesty and sentenced to 16 years’ imprisonment and 18 strokes of the cane.
14	EQ Capital Investments Ltd v Sunbreeze Group Investments Ltd: Minority Oppression & Third-Party Indemnity 01 Nov 2017 Sunbreeze Group Investments Limited (Defendant, Third Party Claimant)Lost	01 Nov 2017	Sunbreeze Group Investments Limited (Defendant, Third Party Claimant): LostThird party claim struck out.
15	EQ Capital Investments Ltd v Sunbreeze Group: Minority Oppression & Marital Privilege 18 Sep 2017 Sunbreeze Group Investments Limited (Defendant)Partial	18 Sep 2017	Sunbreeze Group Investments Limited (Defendant): Application for specific discovery denied in partApplication for specific discovery denied in part.
16	Yap Son On v Ding Pei Zhen: Contractual Interpretation and Share Allotment Dispute 18 Dec 2016 Ding Pei Zhen (Respondent)Partial	18 Dec 2016	Ding Pei Zhen (Respondent): Judgment variedThe amount awarded to the respondent was varied to €941,893.05 less HK$6,389,910.21.
17	Tan Boon Hai v Tan Kia Kok: Dispute Over Clan Association Membership and Election Validity 27 Oct 2016 The Hainan Tan Clan Association (Defendant)Won	27 Oct 2016	The Hainan Tan Clan Association (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant. Plaintiff ordered to pay the Clan costs of $15,000 and reasonable disbursements. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
18	Tanaka Lumber v Datuk Tufail: Trust, Fiduciary Duty & Conspiracy in Timber Trading Dispute 22 Oct 2015 Datuk Haji Mohammad Tufail bin Mahmud (Defendant)Dismissed	22 Oct 2015	Datuk Haji Mohammad Tufail bin Mahmud (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedDatuk Tufail's counterclaim was dismissed because he failed to discharge his burden of proof.
19	Ding Pei Zhen v Yap Son On: Dispute over Goldrooster AG Share Distribution 22 Sep 2015 Ding Pei Zhen (Plaintiff)Won	22 Sep 2015	Ding Pei Zhen (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff on the claim for damages in the sum of €1,835,980.65 less a deduction of HK$6,389,910.21. Assumed EUR as the shares were listed on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange.