Lin Ming Khin

Lin Ming Khin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in family law and misrepresentation. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated expertise across 27 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and disciplinary proceedings.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Medical Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Powers of Attorney	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Medical profession and practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Dentistry and dental practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Professional Misconduct	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Cheques	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Forged Instruments	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mistaken Payment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Consumer Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lin Ming Khin has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Charles Lin LLC	3 cases	60% of cases	Amit Patel v Singapore Dental Council: Appeal on Professional Misconduct in Dentist Supervision(Jul 2024) VVB v VVA: Appeal on Costs for Revocation of Lasting Power of Attorney(Jan 2022) Foo Chee Boon Edward v Singapore Medical Council: Appeal Against Suspension for Inadequate Medical Records(Jan 2020)
Donaldson & Burkinshaw	2 cases	40% of cases	Raffles Money Change v Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken: Forged Cheques & Bank's Right to Debit Account(Feb 2009) Areco International v Lam Cheng Yee: Agent Commission Dispute over Nassim Road Property Sale(Jan 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lin Ming Khin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.0 parties avg	3.0	40%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lin Ming Khin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(40%)	40%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	2(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Amit Patel v Singapore Dental Council: Appeal on Professional Misconduct in Dentist Supervision 23 Jul 2024 Amit Patel (Appellant)Partial	23 Jul 2024	Amit Patel (Appellant): Appeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against orders allowed in partAppeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against orders allowed in part, reducing the period of suspension from 15 to 12 months, and by setting aside the imposition of the penalty of $30,000. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	VVB v VVA: Appeal on Costs for Revocation of Lasting Power of Attorney 05 Jan 2022 VVA (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	05 Jan 2022	VVA (Respondent, Plaintiff): Costs AwardedCosts to be paid by the appellant, fixed by the District Judge (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Foo Chee Boon Edward v Singapore Medical Council: Appeal Against Suspension for Inadequate Medical Records 30 Jan 2020 Foo Chee Boon Edward (Appellant)Won	30 Jan 2020	Foo Chee Boon Edward (Appellant): Appeal AllowedConviction and sentence set aside.
4	Raffles Money Change v Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken: Forged Cheques & Bank's Right to Debit Account 16 Feb 2009 Raffles Money Change Pte Ltd (formerly known as Honest Money Changer Pte Ltd) (Appellant)Lost	16 Feb 2009	Raffles Money Change Pte Ltd (formerly known as Honest Money Changer Pte Ltd) (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.
5	Areco International v Lam Cheng Yee: Agent Commission Dispute over Nassim Road Property Sale 08 Jan 2009 Lam Cheng Yee (Defendant)Lost	08 Jan 2009	Lam Cheng Yee (Defendant): Claim DismissedDefendant's counterclaim dismissed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.