Lin Shuling Joycelyn

Lin Shuling Joycelyn is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2007 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in insolvency law and winding up. Their track record shows a 13.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 63% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lin Shuling Joycelyn has demonstrated expertise across 42 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and commercial disputes.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Lin Shuling Joycelyn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	4 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lin Shuling Joycelyn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Lin Shuling Joycelyn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Lin Shuling Joycelyn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Costs	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lin Shuling Joycelyn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Lin Shuling Joycelyn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Lin Shuling Joycelyn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Remedies	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lin Shuling Joycelyn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Lin Shuling Joycelyn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice13% relevance score	Lin Shuling Joycelyn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Lin Shuling Joycelyn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Lin Shuling Joycelyn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lin Shuling Joycelyn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lin Shuling Joycelyn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lin Shuling Joycelyn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lin Shuling Joycelyn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lin Shuling Joycelyn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lin Shuling Joycelyn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lin Shuling Joycelyn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lin Shuling Joycelyn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lin Shuling Joycelyn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lin Shuling Joycelyn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restraint of Trade	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lin Shuling Joycelyn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lin Shuling Joycelyn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lin Shuling Joycelyn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lin Shuling Joycelyn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contribution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lin Shuling Joycelyn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Joint and Several Liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lin Shuling Joycelyn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Derivative action	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lin Shuling Joycelyn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Non-Solicitation Clause	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lin Shuling Joycelyn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lin Shuling Joycelyn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lin Shuling Joycelyn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lin Shuling Joycelyn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lin Shuling Joycelyn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lin Shuling Joycelyn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lin Shuling Joycelyn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lin Shuling Joycelyn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lin Shuling Joycelyn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Termination	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lin Shuling Joycelyn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lin Shuling Joycelyn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lin Shuling Joycelyn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lin Shuling Joycelyn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lin Shuling Joycelyn has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
PRP Law LLC	6 cases	75% of cases	Lim Oon Kuin v Official Assignee: Appointment of Private Trustees in Bankruptcy Dispute(Dec 2024) Mingda Holding Pte Ltd (in liquidation): Liquidator's Authority & Creditor Funding Agreement under IRDA(May 2024) Value Monetization III Ltd v Lim Beng Choo: Contribution Claims & Limitation Act(Oct 2023)
KhattarWong LLP	1 cases	13% of cases	Cove Development v Ideal Accommodation: Judgment on Admission for Recovery of Grangeford Property(Jul 2009)
KhattarWong	1 cases	13% of cases	Man Financial v Wong: Breach of Non-Solicitation Clause & Restraint of Trade(Nov 2007)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lin Shuling Joycelyn's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 7.0
Complex Cases: 5 (63%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	56.6 parties avg	6.6	63%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	13%
Partial	15.0 parties avg	5.0	13%
Won	110.0 parties avg	10.0	13%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2023	28.8 parties avg	8.8
2024	29.0 parties avg	9.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lin Shuling Joycelyn's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(63%)	63%
Neutral	1(13%)	13%
Partial	1(13%)	13%
Won	1(13%)	13%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	679,142.00	135,828.405 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lim Oon Kuin v Official Assignee: Appointment of Private Trustees in Bankruptcy Dispute 29 Dec 2024 Lim Huey Ching (Claimant)Lost	29 Dec 2024	Lim Huey Ching (Claimant): Bankruptcy order grantedBankruptcy order granted against Lim Huey Ching.
2	Mingda Holding Pte Ltd (in liquidation): Liquidator's Authority & Creditor Funding Agreement under IRDA 15 May 2024 Orient Nickel Pte Ltd (Other)Lost	15 May 2024	Orient Nickel Pte Ltd (Other): Application OpposedAMT's application was granted despite Orient Nickel Pte Ltd's opposition.
3	Value Monetization III Ltd v Lim Beng Choo: Contribution Claims & Limitation Act 26 Oct 2023 Chan Pee Teck Peter (Respondent, Third Party)Won	26 Oct 2023	Chan Pee Teck Peter (Respondent, Third Party): Claim DismissedThird party claim against Chan Pee Teck Peter dismissed.
4	Kelly v Clicks2customers: Breach of Contract and Damages Dispute 05 Jan 2023 Patrick Michael Kelly (Plaintiff)Partial	05 Jan 2023	Patrick Michael Kelly (Plaintiff): Claim allowed in partClaim for unpaid commission in 2015 allowed, totaling $679,142 (including interest). Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	HTL International Holdings: Upholding Judicial Manager's Asset Sale Decision 14 Apr 2021 HTL International Holdings Pte Ltd (Applicant)Lost	14 Apr 2021	HTL International Holdings Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application DismissedThe shareholders' application to set aside the sale of the asset to Golden Hill Capital and direct the JMs to accept Man Wah's offer was dismissed.
6	Ozak Seiko Co Ltd v Ozak Seiko (S) Pte Ltd: Derivative Action & Director's Duties 29 Jan 2019 Ozak Seiko (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Neutral	29 Jan 2019	Ozak Seiko (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): NeutralThe company was a nominal defendant in the derivative actions.
7	Cove Development v Ideal Accommodation: Judgment on Admission for Recovery of Grangeford Property 15 Jul 2009 Ideal Accommodation (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	15 Jul 2009	Ideal Accommodation (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment for possession of the premises was entered against the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Man Financial v Wong: Breach of Non-Solicitation Clause & Restraint of Trade 28 Nov 2007 Wong Bark Chuan David (Respondent)Lost	28 Nov 2007	Wong Bark Chuan David (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the respondent was not entitled to the Compensation under the Termination Agreement.