Lin Wei Qi Wendy

Lin Wei Qi Wendy is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in winding up and setting aside arbitral award. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lin Wei Qi Wendy has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lin Wei Qi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lin Wei Qi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lin Wei Qi Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lin Wei Qi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lin Wei Qi Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lin Wei Qi Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lin Wei Qi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lin Wei Qi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Functus Officio	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lin Wei Qi Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lin Wei Qi Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lin Wei Qi Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lin Wei Qi Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Auditing	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lin Wei Qi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Remission	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lin Wei Qi Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Liquidator's Duties	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lin Wei Qi Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lin Wei Qi Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lin Wei Qi Wendy has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	2 cases	100% of cases	AKN v ALC: Setting Aside Arbitral Award & Tribunal Jurisdiction(Nov 2015) PwC v Celestial Nutrifoods: Appeal on Liquidator's Information Powers Under Section 285(Apr 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lin Wei Qi Wendy's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.5
Complex Cases: 2 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	50%
Unknown	16.0 parties avg	6.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	24.5 parties avg	4.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lin Wei Qi Wendy's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Unknown	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	180,000.00	180,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Unknown: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	AKN v ALC: Setting Aside Arbitral Award & Tribunal Jurisdiction 26 Nov 2015 ALE (Respondent)	26 Nov 2015	ALE (Respondent): -
2	PwC v Celestial Nutrifoods: Appeal on Liquidator's Information Powers Under Section 285 07 Apr 2015 Tham Tuck Seng (Appellant)Lost	07 Apr 2015	Tham Tuck Seng (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of the appeal and previous stay applications fixed at $60,000 plus reasonable disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).