Lin Ying Clare

Lin Ying Clare is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2013. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and breach of contract. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lin Ying Clare has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Lin Ying Clare has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Lin Ying Clare has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Collections	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lin Ying Clare has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lin Ying Clare has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lin Ying Clare has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lin Ying Clare has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lin Ying Clare has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lin Ying Clare has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Warranty Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lin Ying Clare has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lin Ying Clare has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Implied Terms	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lin Ying Clare has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lin Ying Clare has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lin Ying Clare has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lin Ying Clare has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lin Ying Clare has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lin Ying Clare has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Repudiation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lin Ying Clare has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Constructive Dismissal	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lin Ying Clare has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Repudiation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lin Ying Clare has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Price Reduction Services	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lin Ying Clare has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Turnkey Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lin Ying Clare has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lin Ying Clare has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lin Ying Clare has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
KhattarWong	1 cases	33% of cases	Super Continental v Essential Engineering: Breach of Contract & Defective UHT Plant(Dec 2010)
M/s RHT Law LLP	1 cases	33% of cases	Cheah Peng Hock v Luzhou Bio-Chem: Constructive Dismissal & Breach of Mutual Trust(Feb 2013)
RHT Law LLP	1 cases	33% of cases	Foo Song Mee v Ho Kiau Seng: Commission Dispute Over Property Purchase Discount(Sep 2011)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lin Ying Clare's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lin Ying Clare's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
RMB	8,580,000.00	8,580,000.001 cases	1
SGD	165,956.70	165,956.701 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Cheah Peng Hock v Luzhou Bio-Chem: Constructive Dismissal & Breach of Mutual Trust 05 Feb 2013 Cheah Peng Hock (Plaintiff)Won	05 Feb 2013	Cheah Peng Hock (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of RMB 8,580,000.
2	Foo Song Mee v Ho Kiau Seng: Commission Dispute Over Property Purchase Discount 05 Sep 2011 Ho Kiau Seng (Respondent)Lost	05 Sep 2011	Ho Kiau Seng (Respondent): Counterclaim AllowedJudgment was given to the Respondent for his counterclaim of $165,956.70 in the High Court. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Super Continental v Essential Engineering: Breach of Contract & Defective UHT Plant 20 Dec 2010 Super Continental Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	20 Dec 2010	Super Continental Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff, including a refund for the UHT plant, damages for loss of a chance, and costs for electrical installation, raw materials, and personnel. The specific monetary amount is not stated in the judgment extract. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.