Linda Wee

Linda Wee is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2007. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in company law and breach of contract. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Linda Wee has demonstrated expertise across 38 primary practice areas, with significant experience in commercial disputes and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Linda Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Linda Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Linda Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Linda Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Linda Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Linda Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Linda Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Linda Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Linda Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Linda Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Linda Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Linda Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Linda Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Linda Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Linda Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Valuation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Linda Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Linda Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Linda Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Linda Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Linda Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Linda Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Accounting	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Linda Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Quistclose trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Linda Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Nominal damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Linda Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Repudiatory breach	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Linda Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sham Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Linda Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Linda Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Loss of Chance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Linda Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Hotel Management	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Linda Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholders Rights	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Linda Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Linda Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breaches of directors’ duties of care and skill	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Linda Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Linda Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Linda Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Collections	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Linda Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Linda Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Linda Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Linda Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Linda Wee has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Wong Partnership	5 cases	100% of cases	Asia Hotel Investments v Starwood: Breach of Contract & Lost Hotel Opportunity(Apr 2007) Asia Hotel v Starwood: Breach of Contract & Loss of Chance in Hotel Share Acquisition(Sep 2004) Pang Yong Hock v PKS Contracts: Derivative Action & Oppression under Companies Act(Apr 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Linda Wee's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.4
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.0 parties avg	3.0	40%
Won	34.0 parties avg	4.0	60%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2004	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2007	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Linda Wee's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(40%)	40%
Won	3(60%)	60%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	110,839,006.00	55,419,503.002 cases	2
USD	5,000,000.00	5,000,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2004	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Asia Hotel Investments v Starwood: Breach of Contract & Lost Hotel Opportunity 09 Apr 2007 Asia Hotel Investments Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	09 Apr 2007	Asia Hotel Investments Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffAwarded THB110,839,006 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore) plus interest.
2	Asia Hotel v Starwood: Breach of Contract & Loss of Chance in Hotel Share Acquisition 19 Sep 2004 Asia Hotel Investments Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Won	19 Sep 2004	Asia Hotel Investments Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed; damages for loss of chance to acquire Lai Sun stake to be assessed. Costs of appeal and trial awarded to Asia Hotel (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Pang Yong Hock v PKS Contracts: Derivative Action & Oppression under Companies Act 18 Apr 2004 Lee Kim Swee (Appellant)Lost	18 Apr 2004	Lee Kim Swee (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Pacific Rim Palm Oil v PT Asiatic Persada: Breach of Loan Agreement & Quistclose Trust 16 Oct 2003 Pacific Rim Palm Oil Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	16 Oct 2003	Pacific Rim Palm Oil Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffThe court declared that the US$5 million in the Citibank account is held on trust for the Plaintiffs and ordered the 2nd and 3rd Defendants to pay the US$5 million to the Plaintiffs. Interest at 6% per annum was also awarded from the date of the writ of summons until the date of payment.
5	Pang Yong Hock v PKS Contracts Services: Derivative Action & Directors' Duties 01 Sep 2003 Lee Kim Swee (Plaintiff)Lost	01 Sep 2003	Lee Kim Swee (Plaintiff): Application dismissedPlaintiffs' application for leave to commence proceedings in the name of the company was dismissed.