Liu Ze Ming

Liu Ze Ming is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in minority oppression and valuation. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Liu Ze Ming has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Liu Ze Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Liu Ze Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Liu Ze Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Liu Ze Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Liu Ze Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Valuation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Liu Ze Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Share Valuation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Liu Ze Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Liu Ze Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Liu Ze Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Liu Ze Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Shareholders’ dispute	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Liu Ze Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Liu Ze Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Directors	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Liu Ze Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Liu Ze Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Liu Ze Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Liu Ze Ming has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Wong & Leow LLC	2 cases	100% of cases	Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation(Mar 2019) Mukherjee v DyStar: Director's Right to Inspect Company Records under Section 199 of the Companies Act(Dec 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Liu Ze Ming's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.5
Complex Cases: 2 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	17.0 parties avg	7.0	50%
Won	15.0 parties avg	5.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2019	17.0 parties avg	7.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Liu Ze Ming's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	75,000.00	75,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation 11 Mar 2019 Senda International Capital Limited (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim)Partial	11 Mar 2019	Senda International Capital Limited (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim): Counterclaim Allowed in PartInterlocutory judgment with damages to be assessed for Senda against Kiri for breach of cll 15.1(a) and (b) of the SSSA. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
2	Mukherjee v DyStar: Director's Right to Inspect Company Records under Section 199 of the Companies Act 18 Dec 2017 Yao Jianfang (Defendant)Won	18 Dec 2017	Yao Jianfang (Defendant): Judgment in favor of DefendantPlaintiff's application dismissed; plaintiff ordered to pay costs of SGD 25,000. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).