Loh Jia Wen Dynyse

Loh Jia Wen Dynyse is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in medical registration act and disciplinary proceedings (medical). Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Loh Jia Wen Dynyse has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in medical registration act and disciplinary proceedings (medical).

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Medical Registration Act	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Loh Jia Wen Dynyse has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings (Medical)	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Loh Jia Wen Dynyse has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Loh Jia Wen Dynyse has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Medical Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Loh Jia Wen Dynyse has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Medical Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Loh Jia Wen Dynyse has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Loh Jia Wen Dynyse has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Loh Jia Wen Dynyse has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Loh Jia Wen Dynyse has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Loh Jia Wen Dynyse has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Loh Jia Wen Dynyse has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Loh Jia Wen Dynyse has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Loh Jia Wen Dynyse has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Loh Jia Wen Dynyse has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Professional Conduct Rules	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Loh Jia Wen Dynyse has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Loh Jia Wen Dynyse has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Loh Jia Wen Dynyse has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Loh Jia Wen Dynyse has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Loh Jia Wen Dynyse has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	2 cases	100% of cases	Wee Teong Boo v Singapore Medical Council: Judicial Review of Disciplinary Tribunal's Evidentiary Decision(Jul 2022) Pang Ah San v Singapore Medical Council: Doctor's Disciplinary Appeal for Improper Conduct Dismissed(May 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Loh Jia Wen Dynyse's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	22.5 parties avg	2.5	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Loh Jia Wen Dynyse's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	30,000.00	15,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Wee Teong Boo v Singapore Medical Council: Judicial Review of Disciplinary Tribunal's Evidentiary Decision 18 Jul 2022 Singapore Medical Council (Respondent)Won	18 Jul 2022	Singapore Medical Council (Respondent): Application DismissedThe application for leave to seek a quashing order against the Admissibility Decision was dismissed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Pang Ah San v Singapore Medical Council: Doctor's Disciplinary Appeal for Improper Conduct Dismissed 11 May 2021 Singapore Medical Council (Respondent)Won	11 May 2021	Singapore Medical Council (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Dr. Pang ordered to pay the SMC's costs fixed at $30,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).