Loh Jien Li

Loh Jien Li is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2012 to 2016. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in sub-lease agreement and intellectual property law. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 13% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Loh Jien Li has demonstrated expertise across 36 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Loh Jien Li has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Loh Jien Li has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Loh Jien Li has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Loh Jien Li has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Leasing	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Loh Jien Li has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sub-Lease Agreement	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Loh Jien Li has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Loh Jien Li has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Loh Jien Li has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Loh Jien Li has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Loh Jien Li has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Loh Jien Li has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Loh Jien Li has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Contempt	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Loh Jien Li has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Loh Jien Li has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Loh Jien Li has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Loh Jien Li has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Loh Jien Li has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Loh Jien Li has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Loh Jien Li has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Order	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Loh Jien Li has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Loh Jien Li has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Loh Jien Li has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Loh Jien Li has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trademark Infringement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Loh Jien Li has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Groundless threats of infringement proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Loh Jien Li has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Compromise Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Loh Jien Li has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Effluxion of Time	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Loh Jien Li has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Project	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Loh Jien Li has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Loh Jien Li has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Termination of Employment Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Loh Jien Li has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Loh Jien Li has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Loh Jien Li has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Loh Jien Li has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Loh Jien Li has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Loh Jien Li has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Loh Jien Li has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Loh Jien Li has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Stamford Law Corporation	5 cases	63% of cases	Soup Restaurant v Y.E.S. F&B: Sub-Lease Termination Dispute(Nov 2014) Olivine Capital v Chia Chin Yan: Contract Interpretation & Mistake in Sewer Damage Claim(Apr 2014) Olivine Capital v Lee Chiew Leong: Compromise Agreement & Liability for Negligence in Construction Project(Sep 2013)
Morgan Lewis Stamford LLC	3 cases	38% of cases	Singsung Pte Ltd v LG 26 Electronics: Passing Off, Copyright Infringement, Groundless Threats(May 2016) Tahir v Tay Kar Oon: Contempt of Court for Breaching Examination of Judgment Debtor and Mareva Injunction Orders(Apr 2016) Y.E.S. F&B v Soup Restaurant: Contract Interpretation & Sub-Lease Agreement Dispute(Oct 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Loh Jien Li's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 1 (13%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.7 parties avg	2.7	38%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	13%
Won	42.5 parties avg	2.5	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2014	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Loh Jien Li's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(38%)	38%
Partial	1(13%)	13%
Won	4(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	10,000.00	2,500.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2014	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Singsung Pte Ltd v LG 26 Electronics: Passing Off, Copyright Infringement, Groundless Threats 22 May 2016 Singsung Pte Ltd (Appellant)Partial	22 May 2016	Singsung Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; injunction granted; damages to be assessed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Tahir v Tay Kar Oon: Contempt of Court for Breaching Examination of Judgment Debtor and Mareva Injunction Orders 11 Apr 2016 Tahir (Plaintiff)Won	11 Apr 2016	Tahir (Plaintiff): Order of committal grantedOrder of committal granted against the Defendant.
3	Y.E.S. F&B v Soup Restaurant: Contract Interpretation & Sub-Lease Agreement Dispute 01 Oct 2015 Y.E.S. F&B GROUP PTE LTD (Appellant, Defendant)Won	01 Oct 2015	Y.E.S. F&B GROUP PTE LTD (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs. The usual consequential orders will follow. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Soup Restaurant v Y.E.S. F&B: Sub-Lease Termination Dispute 23 Nov 2014 Y.E.S. F&B GROUP PTE LTD (Defendant)Lost	23 Nov 2014	Y.E.S. F&B GROUP PTE LTD (Defendant): Claim DismissedDefendant's argument that the sub-lease was automatically renewed or renewable at their option was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Olivine Capital v Chia Chin Yan: Contract Interpretation & Mistake in Sewer Damage Claim 08 Apr 2014 Chia Chin Yan (Respondent)Lost	08 Apr 2014	Chia Chin Yan (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the decision of the court below was set aside and Suit 762/2012 was remitted for trial.
6	Olivine Capital v Lee Chiew Leong: Compromise Agreement & Liability for Negligence in Construction Project 05 Sep 2013 Chia Chin Yan (Defendant, Respondent)Won	05 Sep 2013	Chia Chin Yan (Defendant, Respondent): Claim DismissedThe plaintiffs' claim against the second defendant was struck out, and the second defendant was awarded costs of $10,000 (excluding disbursements which are to be paid on a reimbursement basis). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Mervin Singh v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Presumption of Knowledge, and Rebuttal 07 Mar 2013 Second Appellant (Appellant)Lost	07 Mar 2013	Second Appellant (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe Court of Appeal dismissed the Second Appellant's appeal, concluding the prosecution proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the second appellant was in possession of the pink box for the purposes of trafficking, and that he had knowledge that the pink box contained diamorphine.
8	Monié v APRIL Management: Interpretation of Employment Agreement & Accrued Obligations 06 Aug 2012 Alain Monié (Plaintiff)Won	06 Aug 2012	Alain Monié (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffThe plaintiff was entitled to be paid by the defendant the six sums set out in Appendix B to the Agreement on the dates prescribed therein commencing on 2 March 2012 and ending on 1 April 2013. The defendant is also ordered to pay the plaintiff interest on any late payment of any of the sums from the date each is due to the date of payment at the usual rate. The defendant is also ordered to pay the plaintiff costs, to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.