Loh Kia Meng

Loh Kia Meng is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 15 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 7 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fiduciary duties and criminal law. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 7 complex cases, representing 47% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated expertise across 93 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	11 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	5 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mistake	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rescission	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sham Agreements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual discretions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Consent Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Burden of proof	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offer	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Quantum meruit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mistake of fact	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Failure of consideration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Change of position	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale of Land	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transfer	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Total failure of consideration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Acquiescence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Acknowledgment of Debt	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Amendments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Running Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rules of construction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Variation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Money Laundering	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cheating	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interest in land	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sham Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Part Performance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intention of Parties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Formalities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Phantom Limb Pain	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Prosthesis	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Option to Purchase	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Global Settlement Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Land Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Home	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Property Ownership	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Loh Kia Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Loh Kia Meng has been affiliated with 7 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rodyk & Davidson LLP	6 cases	40% of cases	Tan Poh Chung v Polylectric Engineering: Winding Up on Just and Equitable Grounds(Mar 2015) Hoy Fatt Pte Ltd v Riway: Option to Purchase, HDB Approval, and Rescission(Jan 2015) Cheung Fung v Shanmugam Thanabal: Negligence in Road Accident at Uncontrolled Junction(Dec 2014)
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP	3 cases	20% of cases	Carpe Diem Holdings v Carpe Diem Playskool: Insolvency, Avoidance of Transactions & Land Sale(Feb 2018) Cheong Kok Leong v Cheong Woon Weng: Oral Agreement, Property Trust, and HDB Ownership Dispute(Aug 2017) Tan Hun Boon v Rui Feng Travel: Damages for Personal Injuries from Traffic Accident(Jul 2017)
Rodyk & Davidson	2 cases	13% of cases	PP v Koh Seah Wee & Lim Chai Meng: Public Servants' Corruption & Cheating(Nov 2011) Firstlink Energy v Creanovate: Directors' Duties, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, and Failure of Consideration(Dec 2006)
AbrahamLow LLC	1 cases	7% of cases	Dong Guitian v PP: Cheating, Dishonest Inducement & Foreign Worker Recruitment(May 2004)
Denton Rodyk & Davidson LLP	1 cases	7% of cases	Cheong Woon Weng v Cheong Kok Leong: Land Dispute over Beneficial Interest in Property(Nov 2016)
Rodyk and Davidson	1 cases	7% of cases	Sumitomo v Salim: Applications to Adduce Further Evidence and File Single Case at Substantive Appeals(Sep 2004)
Loh Kia Meng	1 cases	7% of cases	Firstlink Energy v Creanovate: Setting Aside Default Judgment for Electronic Filing System Service(Jan 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Loh Kia Meng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.4
Complex Cases: 7 (47%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	43.4 parties avg	3.4	27%
Neutral	24.0 parties avg	4.0	13%
Partial	25.0 parties avg	5.0	13%
Won	82.9 parties avg	2.9	53%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2006	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2007	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2008	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2011	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	23.3 parties avg	3.3
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2018	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Loh Kia Meng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(25%)	25%
Neutral	2(13%)	13%
Partial	2(13%)	13%
Won	8(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	6,752,395.60	750,266.189 cases	9

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2006	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	3 12	Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 15 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Carpe Diem Holdings v Carpe Diem Playskool: Insolvency, Avoidance of Transactions & Land Sale 20 Feb 2018 Carpe Diem Holdings Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	20 Feb 2018	Carpe Diem Holdings Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application DismissedOriginating Summons dismissed with costs to the fourth defendant fixed at $10,000 and reasonable disbursements. I made no order as to costs as regard the first defendant and the second defendant. Specifically, leave was not granted to proceed against either the first defendant or the second defendant. It follows that the questions sought to be determined under s 310 of the Act need not be conclusively answered. That said, I have, in the course of my grounds, taken the view that the assignment the Lease was not wrongful. Accordingly, those questions might very well have been answered in substance. Consequently, prayers 3 and 4, which sought a reversal of the transfer of the Lease or damages for loss of profit in lieu, were also not granted given that the assignment of the Lease was not wrongful in the first place. The proper recourse for the plaintiff lay in lodging a proof of debt for contractual damages in the liquidation of the first defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Cheong Kok Leong v Cheong Woon Weng: Oral Agreement, Property Trust, and HDB Ownership Dispute 14 Aug 2017 Cheong Woon Weng (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	14 Aug 2017	Cheong Woon Weng (Respondent, Plaintiff): Judgment for RespondentThe Respondent was entitled to a half-share of the Property as a tenant-in-common, a half-share of the net rental proceeds from the Property, and a half-share of the net sale proceeds of the Property.
3	Tan Hun Boon v Rui Feng Travel: Damages for Personal Injuries from Traffic Accident 30 Jul 2017 Md Ismail Bin Pungut (Defendant)Lost	30 Jul 2017	Md Ismail Bin Pungut (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantDefendant ordered to pay $1,228,697.80 in damages to the Plaintiff (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Cheong Woon Weng v Cheong Kok Leong: Land Dispute over Beneficial Interest in Property 28 Nov 2016 Cheong Woon Weng (Plaintiff)Won	28 Nov 2016	Cheong Woon Weng (Plaintiff): Claim AllowedThe plaintiff's claim for a beneficial interest in the property was allowed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Tan Poh Chung v Polylectric Engineering: Winding Up on Just and Equitable Grounds 15 Mar 2015 Tan Poh Chung (Applicant)Won	15 Mar 2015	Tan Poh Chung (Applicant): Winding up order grantedThe court ordered the company to be wound up.
6	Hoy Fatt Pte Ltd v Riway: Option to Purchase, HDB Approval, and Rescission 19 Jan 2015 Riway International Group Pte Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	19 Jan 2015	Riway International Group Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claims DismissedClaims against Riway International Group Pte Ltd were dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Cheung Fung v Shanmugam Thanabal: Negligence in Road Accident at Uncontrolled Junction 17 Dec 2014 Shanmugam Thanabal (Defendant)Won	17 Dec 2014	Shanmugam Thanabal (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant; the plaintiff's claim was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Hua Xin v IPCO: Stay of Proceedings for Arbitration & Global Settlement Agreement 13 Nov 2012 Hua Xin Innovation Incubator Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	13 Nov 2012	Hua Xin Innovation Incubator Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application granted for consolidationThe court ordered that the present Suit (Suit 729 of 2012/E) be consolidated with Suit 630 of 2012/P and do proceed as one action.
9	PP v Koh Seah Wee & Lim Chai Meng: Public Servants' Corruption & Cheating 03 Nov 2011 Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (Other)Neutral	03 Nov 2011	Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (Other): N/AIPOS was a victim of fraud by Koh.
10	Attorney-General v Hertzberg Daniel: Contempt of Court & Freedom of Speech 24 Nov 2008 Dow Jones Publishing Company (Asia) Inc (Respondent)Lost	24 Nov 2008	Dow Jones Publishing Company (Asia) Inc (Respondent): Orders of committal for contempt grantedOrders of committal for contempt granted against the third respondent, Dow Jones Publishing Company (Asia) Inc. Fine of $25,000 to be paid within 7 days. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	Creanovate v Firstlink Energy: Directors' Fiduciary Duties & Companies Act Breach 23 Sep 2007 Firstlink Energy Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	23 Sep 2007	Firstlink Energy Pte Ltd (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentThe respondent succeeded in its claim against Creanovate for the aggregate sum of $3.26m. The respondent also succeeded in its claim for another sum of $1m which had been lent to Creanovate.
12	Firstlink Energy v Creanovate: Directors' Duties, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, and Failure of Consideration 21 Dec 2006 Firstlink Energy Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	21 Dec 2006	Firstlink Energy Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment against Creanovate for $3.26m plus $1m, and declaration that Ngu and Tang are liable to account for $3.32m (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
13	Firstlink Energy v Creanovate: Setting Aside Default Judgment for Electronic Filing System Service 26 Jan 2006 Firstlink Energy Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	26 Jan 2006	Firstlink Energy Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application AllowedPlaintiffs' application to set aside the interlocutory judgment was allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	Sumitomo v Salim: Applications to Adduce Further Evidence and File Single Case at Substantive Appeals 02 Sep 2004 Sumitomo Corp Capital Asia Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	02 Sep 2004	Sumitomo Corp Capital Asia Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Application granted in partApplication to file a single case and a single core bundle for the appeals was granted. Application to adduce additional evidence was adjourned to be heard before the full Court of Appeal.
15	Dong Guitian v PP: Cheating, Dishonest Inducement & Foreign Worker Recruitment 05 May 2004 Dong Guitian (Appellant)Lost	05 May 2004	Dong Guitian (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.