Loke Pei-Shan

Loke Pei-Shan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2009. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in disciplinary proceedings and administrative law. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 40% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Loke Pei-Shan has demonstrated expertise across 29 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and medical ethics.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Loke Pei-Shan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Medical Ethics	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Loke Pei-Shan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Loke Pei-Shan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Loke Pei-Shan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Medical profession and practice	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Loke Pei-Shan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Loke Pei-Shan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Loke Pei-Shan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Loke Pei-Shan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Loke Pei-Shan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Loke Pei-Shan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Non est factum	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Loke Pei-Shan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Loke Pei-Shan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Loke Pei-Shan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Default Judgement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Loke Pei-Shan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Loke Pei-Shan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Loke Pei-Shan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Loke Pei-Shan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Loke Pei-Shan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Professional Misconduct	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Loke Pei-Shan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings (Medical)	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Loke Pei-Shan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Professional Ethics	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Loke Pei-Shan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Loke Pei-Shan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Loke Pei-Shan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Surgical procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Loke Pei-Shan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Loke Pei-Shan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Loke Pei-Shan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Loke Pei-Shan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Documentary Credits	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Loke Pei-Shan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Medical Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Loke Pei-Shan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Loke Pei-Shan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann LLP	4 cases	80% of cases	Surender Singh v Li Man Kay: Medical Negligence in Kidney Donor Death(Jul 2009) Chai Chwan v Singapore Medical Council: Judicial Review of Disciplinary Proceedings(May 2009) OCBC v Frankel Motor: Setting Aside Default Judgment & Non Est Factum Defense(Mar 2009)
Rajah & Tann	1 cases	20% of cases	Ho Paul v Singapore Medical Council: Doctor's Suspension Over Subutex Prescription Challenged(Jan 2008)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Loke Pei-Shan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.2
Complex Cases: 2 (40%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	34.0 parties avg	4.0	60%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	34.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Loke Pei-Shan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(60%)	60%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	29,000.00	9,666.673 cases	3
USD	1,171,678.02	1,171,678.021 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2009	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Surender Singh v Li Man Kay: Medical Negligence in Kidney Donor Death 21 Jul 2009 National University Hospital (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	21 Jul 2009	National University Hospital (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for PlaintiffInterlocutory judgment with costs awarded to Plaintiffs against National University Hospital; damages to be assessed at a later date.
2	Chai Chwan v Singapore Medical Council: Judicial Review of Disciplinary Proceedings 12 May 2009 Chai Chwan (Applicant)Lost	12 May 2009	Chai Chwan (Applicant): Application for leave for judicial review dismissedDr. Chai was ordered to pay the SMC costs fixed at $25,000 plus reasonable disbursements. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	OCBC v Frankel Motor: Setting Aside Default Judgment & Non Est Factum Defense 30 Mar 2009 Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	30 Mar 2009	Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd (Plaintiff): Appeal dismissedThe appeal by the second defendant to set aside the default judgment was dismissed with costs fixed at $1500 and disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	DBS Bank v Carrier Singapore: Deceit in Letter of Credit Transaction 08 Apr 2008 DBS Bank Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	08 Apr 2008	DBS Bank Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffThe court found Carrier liable in damages for fraudulent misrepresentation to DBS in the sum of US$1,395,748.02 less the benefit received in the sum of US$224,070. Assumed USD, as the judgment involves transactions in USD.
5	Ho Paul v Singapore Medical Council: Doctor's Suspension Over Subutex Prescription Challenged 15 Jan 2008 Ho Paul (Appellant)Partial	15 Jan 2008	Ho Paul (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partThe three-month suspension was set aside, and the fine was increased to $2,500 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).