Long Ai Ming

Long Ai Ming is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in patents and intellectual property law. Their track record shows a 75.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Long Ai Ming has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in patents and intellectual property law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Patents	3 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Long Ai Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Long Ai Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Long Ai Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Long Ai Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice13% relevance score	Long Ai Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Long Ai Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Long Ai Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Groundless threat	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Long Ai Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Patent Infringement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Long Ai Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Novelty	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Long Ai Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Validity	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Long Ai Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Long Ai Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Inventive step	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Long Ai Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Long Ai Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Long Ai Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Long Ai Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Long Ai Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Long Ai Ming has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP	4 cases	100% of cases	TOWA Corp v ASMPT: Patent Infringement Damages Assessment Appeal(Nov 2024) TOWA Corp v ASMPT: Patent Infringement Damages Assessment Clarification(Jun 2024) ASM Technology v Towa Corporation: Patent Infringement & Modularity(Jan 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Long Ai Ming's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25%
Won	32.7 parties avg	2.7	75%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Long Ai Ming's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Won	3(75%)	75%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
JPY	386,942,396.00	386,942,396.001 cases	1
SGD	85,000.00	42,500.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	TOWA Corp v ASMPT: Patent Infringement Damages Assessment Appeal 21 Nov 2024 TOWA Corporation (Appellant, Claimant, Respondent)Lost	21 Nov 2024	TOWA Corporation (Appellant, Claimant, Respondent): Appeal dismissed in its entiretyTOWA's appeal against the findings in the AD Decisions that resulted in it receiving less damages for the breach of its Patent was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	TOWA Corp v ASMPT: Patent Infringement Damages Assessment Clarification 26 Jun 2024 TOWA Corporation (Plaintiff)Won	26 Jun 2024	TOWA Corporation (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffDamages awarded to the plaintiff in the sum of ¥386,942,396, excluding interests and costs. Assumed JPY as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	ASM Technology v Towa Corporation: Patent Infringement & Modularity 04 Jan 2018 TOWA Corporation (Respondent)Won	04 Jan 2018	TOWA Corporation (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs of $85,000 (inclusive of disbursements) to be paid by the Appellant to the Respondent. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Towa Corp v ASM Technology: Patent Infringement, Moulding Machine, Inventive Step 21 Dec 2016 TOWA Corporation (Plaintiff)Won	21 Dec 2016	TOWA Corporation (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; an inquiry as to damages or, alternatively, at the plaintiff’s option, an account of profits and an order for payment of all sums found due upon making such inquiry or account; and interest at 5.33% per annum (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).