Loo Liang Zhi

Loo Liang Zhi is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2023 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in child custody and child support. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Loo Liang Zhi has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in child custody and child support.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Child Custody	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Loo Liang Zhi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Loo Liang Zhi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Loo Liang Zhi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Loo Liang Zhi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Access to Children	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Loo Liang Zhi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Loo Liang Zhi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Parenting	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Loo Liang Zhi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Loo Liang Zhi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Loo Liang Zhi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Loo Liang Zhi has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Sterling Law Corporation	1 cases	100% of cases	DDO v DDN: Variation of Access Orders Based on Father's Conduct and Children's Welfare(Oct 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Loo Liang Zhi's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Loo Liang Zhi's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	DDO v DDN: Variation of Access Orders Based on Father's Conduct and Children's Welfare 23 Oct 2023 DDO (Applicant)Won	23 Oct 2023	DDO (Applicant): Access Orders VariedThe court agreed with the mother that the father’s access ought to be reduced by removing principally his overseas and overnight access to the children.