Lorraine Ho

Lorraine Ho is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2007 to 2008. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in insurance and insurance bad faith. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lorraine Ho has demonstrated expertise across 12 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Lorraine Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lorraine Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lorraine Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Insurance Bad Faith	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lorraine Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lorraine Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lorraine Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lorraine Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lorraine Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lorraine Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Crossclaims	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lorraine Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lorraine Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lorraine Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lorraine Ho has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	3 cases	100% of cases	Management Corp v DTZ: Specific Discovery & Litigation Privilege(Jun 2008) Tay Eng Chuan v Ace Insurance: Arbitration Clauses, Insurance Policy Interpretation & Double Recovery(Jun 2008) Tay Eng Chuan v Ace Insurance Ltd: Claim for Loss of Sight Insurance Benefit Dispute(Dec 2007)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lorraine Ho's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	22.7 parties avg	2.7

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lorraine Ho's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Partial	1(33%)	33%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3,500.00	3,500.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Management Corp v DTZ: Specific Discovery & Litigation Privilege 29 Jun 2008 DTZ Debenham Tie Leung Property Management Services Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	29 Jun 2008	DTZ Debenham Tie Leung Property Management Services Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application for specific discovery allowed in partApplication for specific discovery allowed in part.
2	Tay Eng Chuan v Ace Insurance: Arbitration Clauses, Insurance Policy Interpretation & Double Recovery 26 Jun 2008 Ace Insurance Ltd (Respondent)Lost	26 Jun 2008	Ace Insurance Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was allowed, and the respondent was ordered to pay the appellant's reasonable disbursements.
3	Tay Eng Chuan v Ace Insurance Ltd: Claim for Loss of Sight Insurance Benefit Dispute 04 Dec 2007 Ace Insurance Ltd (Defendant)Won	04 Dec 2007	Ace Insurance Ltd (Defendant): Application grantedDefendant's application to strike out the plaintiff's originating summons was granted with costs of $3,500 and reasonable disbursements to be paid by the plaintiff. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.