Low Huai Pin

Low Huai Pin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in negligence and assessment of damages. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 60% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Low Huai Pin has demonstrated expertise across 31 primary practice areas, with significant experience in automobile accidents and personal injury.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Automobile Accidents	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Low Huai Pin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Low Huai Pin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Negligence	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Low Huai Pin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Costs	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice24% relevance score	Low Huai Pin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Low Huai Pin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Low Huai Pin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Causation	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Low Huai Pin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Low Huai Pin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Low Huai Pin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Low Huai Pin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Low Huai Pin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Huai Pin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Vicarious liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Low Huai Pin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Low Huai Pin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Low Huai Pin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Huai Pin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Motor accidents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Low Huai Pin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal injuries cases	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Low Huai Pin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Computation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Low Huai Pin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Experts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Low Huai Pin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Low Huai Pin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Low Huai Pin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Huai Pin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Huai Pin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Prospective Overruling	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Low Huai Pin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interlocutory Judgment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Low Huai Pin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Huai Pin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Low Huai Pin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Apportionment of Liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Low Huai Pin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Huai Pin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bifurcation of Proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Low Huai Pin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Low Huai Pin has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	5 cases	100% of cases	Lim Chun Yong v Yap Jeffrey: Negligence, Motor Accidents, and Damages for Brain Injuries(Jun 2024) Foo Kok Boon v Ngow Kheong Shen: Prospective Overruling & Causation in Interlocutory Judgments(Jul 2023) CXN v CXO: Negligence and Apportionment of Liability in Car Collision Case(Dec 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Low Huai Pin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.4
Complex Cases: 3 (60%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	25.7 parties avg	5.7	40%
Neutral	24.0 parties avg	4.0	40%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2023	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2024	17.0 parties avg	7.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Low Huai Pin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(40%)	40%
Neutral	2(40%)	40%
Partial	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lim Chun Yong v Yap Jeffrey: Negligence, Motor Accidents, and Damages for Brain Injuries 09 Jun 2024 Syarikat Continent Lorry Transport Sdn Bhd (Defendant)Lost	09 Jun 2024	Syarikat Continent Lorry Transport Sdn Bhd (Defendant): Vicariously LiableThe fifth defendant was found vicariously liable for the negligence of the fourth defendant and 50% liable for the plaintiff's injuries.
2	Foo Kok Boon v Ngow Kheong Shen: Prospective Overruling & Causation in Interlocutory Judgments 11 Jul 2023 Leyau Yew Teck (Respondent, Defendant)Neutral	11 Jul 2023	Leyau Yew Teck (Respondent, Defendant): NeutralThe judgment does not specify an outcome for this party.
3	CXN v CXO: Negligence and Apportionment of Liability in Car Collision Case 12 Dec 2022 CXO (Defendant)Lost	12 Dec 2022	CXO (Defendant): Liability apportionedLiability apportioned at 65%.
4	Dai Yi Ting v Chuang Fu Yuan: Bifurcation Order in Personal Injury Case 10 Oct 2022 Grabcycle (SG) Pte Ltd (Third Party)Neutral	10 Oct 2022	Grabcycle (SG) Pte Ltd (Third Party): No specific outcomeNo specific outcome mentioned for the third party in relation to the bifurcation application.
5	Yap Boon Fong Yvonne v Wong Kok Mun Alvin: Damages Assessment for Road Accident & Loss of Earnings 25 Nov 2018 Lim Chuah Heng (Respondent, Appellant)Partial	25 Nov 2018	Lim Chuah Heng (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partThe award for pre-trial loss of earning capacity was replaced with an award for pre-trial loss of earnings. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.